Security report for zipy.ai
Zipy Inc. · Technology · United States
Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.
Zipy Inc. operates a sophisticated AI-powered digital customer experience platform that integrates session replay, error tracking, API performance monitoring, and product analytics into a unified SaaS offering. The company targets developers, product teams, engineering leaders, QA, and customer support teams, positioning itself as a comprehensive solution to improve product adoption, reduce time to resolution, and enhance customer experience. The platform is well-regarded in the market with strong customer testimonials and industry recognition, including SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliance. Technically, the website leverages modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries, including ReactJS, VueJS, Angular, and others, hosted likely on Google Cloud infrastructure with Webflow CMS. The site is optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, employing advanced analytics and marketing tools such as Mixpanel, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Apollo.io. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and key security headers, though there is room for enhancement with additional headers and explicit incident response contacts. The security posture is solid with no critical vulnerabilities detected, and privacy compliance is robust with clear policies and consent mechanisms. The domain registration details align well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, Zipy presents a professional, secure, and user-focused digital presence with a strong market position in the technology sector.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 95/ 100 · Low
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
- CWE-327
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V12.1.1
- RFC 8996
- RFC 7568
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: tls_versions TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-8(1): NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8(1): Cryptographic Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching zipy.ai
This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 69
- Security headers
- 60
- Email security
- 85
- DNS health
- 85
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 95
- Average
- 82
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS and data injection risks.
- Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
- Provide explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
- Enhance cookie consent management with detailed data retention and processing disclosures.
- Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
Contact details published on the site
- Addresses
- Legal name
- Zipy Inc.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Zipy Inc.
- Description
- Zipy is a powerful The digital customer experience platform with Product Analytics, Error Tracking, API performance, and Session Replay - all in one. With Zipy, you can analyze user behavior, monitor errors, and drive product adoption. Companies like MindTickle, Sprinto, PazCare, Townscript, Klenty etc. are using Zipy and they are already seeing a huge improvement in their customer experience and software performance.
- Key services
- Session Replay, Error Monitoring, Performance Monitoring, Product Analytics, AI Summaries, Heatmaps, API Performance Tracking
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- JavaScript, jQuery, Mixpanel, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Apollo.io, Factors.ai, Webflow CMS, Lottie animations
- Frameworks
- ReactJS, VueJS, Angular, NextJS, jQuery, Javascript, Ember, Typescript, Svelte, PHP
- Platforms
- Web, Mobile (iOS, Android, React Native, Flutter)
- Performance
- fast
- Mobile
- excellent
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 85/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Security headers present
- No exposed sensitive data detected
- Use of secure cookies in Mixpanel config
- Consent mechanism for cookies
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Microsoft Clarity, Apollo.io, Factors.ai
- Tracking level
- extensive
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- Bing Ads
- Tracking pixels
- Mixpanel, Microsoft Clarity, Apollo.io, Factors.ai, Bing UET
- Marketing tools
- Mixpanel, Apollo.io, Factors.ai
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and rich content.
- Strong emphasis on AI-powered session replay and error monitoring for developers and product teams.
- Multiple customer testimonials and case studies enhance trust.
- Comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms policies with consent mechanisms.
- Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with extensive user tracking.
- Security headers present but could be enhanced with additional policies.
- No signs of WAF blocking or content restrictions.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with zipy.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zipy.ai.