Skip to main content

Security report for zetcom.com

Zetcom · Technology · Switzerland

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zetcom is a technology company specializing in software solutions and services tailored for museums, collections, corporate archives, and organizational management. Their website presents a professional and multilingual platform targeting institutions requiring collection management software. The company leverages modern web technologies including WordPress CMS with Elementor, Google Analytics, Hubspot marketing and analytics tools, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The technical infrastructure is solid with HTTPS enforced and a moderate performance profile. Security posture is good with no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and policies are absent. Privacy compliance is partially met with cookie consent but lacks a clear privacy policy and terms of service. The domain WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about registration transparency but does not detract from the website's operational professionalism. Overall, Zetcom demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in compliance documentation and security policy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zetcom.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zetcom operates in a niche market providing collection management software primarily for museums and archives. Their business model focuses on software development and service provision, targeting institutional clients. The website content and structured data indicate a medium-sized company based in Switzerland, with a consistent brand identity and good content quality. The use of Hubspot and Google Analytics suggests active marketing and customer engagement strategies. Absence of WHOIS data may indicate recent domain registration or privacy protection, which should be monitored. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified, indicating a focused business scope. The company’s market position appears stable within its specialized sector, with potential growth through enhanced digital trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The use of reputable third-party services like Cloudflare (implied), Hubspot, and Google Analytics is noted, but these introduce tracking and data collection considerations. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by publishing formal security policies, implementing additional HTTP headers, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide explicit security and incident response policies accessible on the website.
  5. Monitor and clarify domain registration details to improve legitimacy and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zetcom
Description
zetcom entwickelt Softwarelösungen und Services für Museen, Sammlungen und Firmenarchive sowie Lösungen für Organisationsmanagement.
Key services
Software solutions for museums, Services for collections and corporate archives, Organizational management solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Analytics, Hubspot, Cookiebot, Cloudflare (implied by __cf_bm cookie)
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hubspot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Hubspot tracking
Marketing tools
Hubspot, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional design with multilingual support (DE, EN, FR)
  3. Cookie consent implemented with detailed cookie categories
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content
  5. Contact phone number provided in structured data
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. WHOIS data missing, raising questions about domain registration transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, integrating Google Analytics and Hubspot for marketing and analytics. Cookiebot manages cookie consent with detailed categorization. The site is multilingual, supporting German, English, and French. Performance is moderate with caching and minification evident. Accessibility features are basic but present. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but Cloudflare services are implied by cookies. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated, supporting a professional user experience with opportunities for enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zetcom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zetcom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.