Skip to main content

Security report for zephyr.bar

Atom · E-commerce · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website domains.atom.com/lpd/name/www.zephyr.bar is a premium domain sales landing page operated by Atom, offering the domain Zephyr.Bar for purchase. The business model focuses on domain marketplace services, providing premium domain sales with options for installment payments and transaction support. The site targets startups and entrepreneurs seeking memorable and brandable domain names, particularly in the hospitality or bar industry. The website is professionally designed with good content relevance and consistent branding, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA for bot protection. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies limit the transparency and trustworthiness of the domain registration and business operations. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and reCAPTCHA implemented, but missing security headers and incident response information are areas for improvement. Overall, the site presents a functional and professional front for domain sales but would benefit from enhanced compliance and transparency measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zephyr.bar

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
65
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atom operates as a premium domain reseller with a focus on high-value, brandable domains such as Zephyr.Bar. The business targets entrepreneurs and startups, positioning itself in the e-commerce sector specializing in domain sales. The platform offers flexible payment options and free transaction support, indicating a customer-centric approach. The market position is that of a niche premium domain marketplace, leveraging trust signals like verified premium domain labels and professional design. The company appears medium-sized with no clear parent or subsidiary relationships disclosed. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information suggests a need for improved corporate transparency. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with Google services for analytics and marketing, but no direct business partners or subsidiaries are identified.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse, reflecting basic security best practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of published privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Recommendations include implementing comprehensive security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing clear incident response channels to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers for customer and incident response.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct audits to improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atom
Description
Zephyr.Bar is a verified premium domain available for purchase. Buy now or pay in installments. Free transaction support, no extra fees. Zephyr.Bar, a dynamic domain name exuding a sense of freshness and movement, perfect for a cutting-edge bar or cocktail lounge. With only 6 letters and 2 syllables, its short, memorable, and easy to spell, making it ideal for a startup look
Key services
Premium domain sales, Installment payment options, Transaction support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser Agent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Intercom
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a premium domain sales landing page for Zephyr.Bar
  2. No WHOIS data available from raw output
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  5. Uses Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. No forms detected in the HTML snippet
  8. No social media links explicitly found
  9. Content is adult-oriented by association (bar domain) but no explicit adult content
  10. No WAF or blocking detected, content fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including Google Fonts for typography, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The New Relic Browser Agent is present for performance monitoring. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter Card metadata. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified from the content. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML snippet. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional domain sales platform but lacks advanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zephyr.bar. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zephyr.bar.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.