Skip to main content

Security report for zeotap.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at zeotap.com is currently inaccessible due to a critical WordPress error, displaying only an error page with no business content or navigation. This prevents any meaningful analysis of the company's services, policies, or contact information. The domain is registered since 2014 with a reputable registrar and uses Cloudflare DNS, indicating some level of infrastructure maturity. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the security posture. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, indicating poor compliance with privacy regulations. The absence of contact information and business details further limits trust and credibility assessment. Technically, the site runs on WordPress but is currently broken, which is a critical operational issue. No analytics, tracking, or marketing technologies are detected, likely due to the error page. Security best practices such as DNSSEC and security headers are missing, and no forms or data collection mechanisms are present. The domain registration data is consistent and appropriate for a business of this age, but the website's current state severely impacts its digital maturity and user trust. Security posture is weak due to the critical error and missing security controls. There is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the site is not operational, which poses a significant risk to business continuity and reputation. Immediate remediation of the WordPress error and implementation of security and privacy best practices are essential to restore functionality and trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of zeotap.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zeotap.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
90
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the website's inaccessibility and lack of content, detailed business intelligence is unavailable. The domain age suggests an established entity since 2014, but no information about market positioning, business model, or services can be derived from the current site. The use of Cloudflare DNS indicates some investment in infrastructure. No partner or subsidiary domains are identified. The lack of visible contact or corporate information limits insights into the company's operational scale or customer segments.

Security posture

The security posture is currently poor. The website lacks critical security headers and DNSSEC, which are important for protecting against common web attacks and DNS spoofing. The presence of a critical WordPress error page indicates potential operational vulnerabilities and poor maintenance. No evidence of secure forms, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure policies is found. The domain registration is stable and not privacy protected, which is positive for transparency. Overall, the site is vulnerable due to its broken state and missing security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Urgently fix the WordPress critical error to restore website availability and functionality.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  5. Add clear contact information and incident response channels to improve trust and security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently down or broken showing WordPress critical error page
  2. No visible business or contact information on the homepage
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No forms or data collection elements present
  5. No social media or external business links detected except WordPress and Cloudflare references
  6. Domain is registered since 2014 with stable registrar and Cloudflare DNS
  7. No security headers or DNSSEC implemented
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress but currently displays a critical error page, indicating a failure in the CMS or its plugins/themes. The domain uses Cloudflare DNS but does not have DNSSEC enabled. No scripts, analytics, or marketing technologies are detected in the HTML content. The site lacks meta tags beyond basic viewport and charset, and no SEO or accessibility features are evident. Hosting provider is inferred as Cloudflare due to nameservers. The site performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to the error page. Overall, the technical implementation is incomplete and requires urgent remediation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zeotap.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zeotap.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.