Skip to main content

Security report for zeiss.pl

Carl Zeiss Sp. z o.o. · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Carl Zeiss Sp. z o.o. operates as the Polish branch of the global ZEISS Group, a leading international technology company specializing in optical and optoelectronic solutions. The website presents a comprehensive overview of ZEISS's business groups in Poland, including industrial metrology, microscopy, medical technology, and vision care. The company has a strong market position with over 175 years of experience and a large workforce in Poland. The digital infrastructure is modern, leveraging Adobe Experience Manager and advanced web technologies, ensuring good performance and user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. Privacy compliance is moderate, with cookie consent implemented but no clear privacy policy page found. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy corporate presence with room for improvement in transparency and privacy documentation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of zeiss.pl. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zeiss.pl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention zeiss.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for zeiss.pl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ZEISS Poland targets professional and industrial customers in healthcare, manufacturing, and technology sectors. The business model focuses on high-quality product manufacturing, sales, service, and training. The company benefits from its global brand reputation and diversified business units. The website links to multiple global ZEISS domains, indicating a well-integrated partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include active event promotion and R&D centers in Poland. The company maintains a strong local presence with subsidiaries focused on software development and shared services. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining compliance and enhancing direct customer engagement channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests gaps in transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and cookie consent tools is managed but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Compliance with GDPR is implied but not explicitly documented. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and communication channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed and accessible privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response page including contact information for security issues.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility, including direct emails and phone numbers for sales and support.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Carl Zeiss Sp. z o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Carl Zeiss Sp. z o.o.
Description
ZEISS jest wiodącym międzynarodowym przedsiębiorstwem z branży technologii optycznych i optoelektronicznych. Firma oferuje rozwiązania w obszarach optyki okularowej, technologii medycznej, mikroskopii, metrologii przemysłowej oraz innych specjalistycznych dziedzinach.
Key services
Soczewki okularowe i urządzenia do badania wzroku, Technologie medyczne w okulistyce i mikrochirurgii, Mikroskopy optyczne, elektronowe i rentgenowskie, Metrologia przemysłowa i usługi pomiarowe, Rozwiązania dla przemysłu półprzewodników i kontroli jakości
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix RUM, Google Tag Manager, SVG icons, Lazy loading images, JavaScript modules
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieLaw.org banner
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. No explicit privacy policy page found on main site
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  4. Contact page exists but no direct emails or phone numbers found in main HTML
  5. Strong branding and consistent corporate identity
  6. Multiple business segments clearly described
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Adobe Experience Manager)
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration analysis
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, utilizing modern JavaScript modules, lazy loading for images, and SVG icons for scalability. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip links. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD for breadcrumbs and organization. Technical risks are minimal but require continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zeiss.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zeiss.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.