Skip to main content

Security report for zeeve.io

Zeeve Inc · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zeeve Inc operates a blockchain deployment and management platform trusted by thousands of blockchain startups, enterprises, and Web3 developers. The company provides services to deploy, scale, monitor, and manage decentralized applications, positioning itself as a key player in the blockchain technology sector. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional branding and comprehensive service descriptions targeting blockchain and Web3 audiences. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, supported by a robust tech stack including multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, and Zoho SalesIQ. The site is hosted with CDN support (BunnyCDN) ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS, security headers, and secure form implementations. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a strong posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are recommended for enhanced trust and compliance. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for tech companies but limits transparency. Overall, Zeeve presents a professional, secure, and well-optimized web presence suitable for its business domain. Strategic improvements in security transparency and incident response readiness would further strengthen its trustworthiness and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zeeve.io

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zeeve is positioned as a technology platform specializing in blockchain infrastructure management, serving a niche but growing market of blockchain startups and enterprises. Its business model is platform-as-a-service, focusing on simplifying blockchain deployment and operational management. The company leverages a strong digital marketing ecosystem with extensive analytics and tracking, indicating a data-driven growth strategy. The presence of social media channels and testimonials suggests active engagement with its community and customers. The lack of explicit physical address or phone contact may indicate a primarily digital-first or remote operational model. No parent or subsidiary relationships are evident from the data.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and secure form handling including reCAPTCHA v3. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure program represents a compliance gap and potential risk in incident management. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts requires ongoing vigilance to prevent supply chain risks. GDPR compliance indicators are present through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved with formalized policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider enabling DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security and integrity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zeeve Inc
Description
Zeeve is trusted by thousands of Blockchain startups, Enterprises and Web3 Developers to deploy, scale, monitor and manage their decentralized applications.
Key services
Blockchain deployment, Scaling decentralized applications, Monitoring blockchain infrastructure, Management of decentralized applications
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Elementor, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Mixpanel, Zoho SalesIQ, Smartlook, Bing Ads, ShareThis
Frameworks
Elementor (WordPress page builder)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with reCAPTCHA v3
  • Use of layered access for WHOIS data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, Smartlook, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Mixpanel, Smartlook, ShareThis
Marketing tools
Zoho SalesIQ, Mixpanel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain registration transparency.
  3. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Yoast SEO for content management and SEO.
  4. Strong use of analytics and marketing tools indicating mature digital marketing strategy.
  5. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented, enhancing security posture.
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet; contact likely via forms or social media.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, indicating GDPR awareness.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information published on the site.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  10. Content is professional, focused on blockchain deployment and management platform services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform enhanced with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO for content and SEO management. It uses a CDN (BunnyCDN) for content delivery, ensuring fast load times and global reach. The site integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, and Zoho SalesIQ, reflecting a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well addressed. The technical stack is current with no deprecated or vulnerable libraries detected in the provided content. Opportunities exist to improve DNS security and formalize security-related documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zeeve.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zeeve.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.