Skip to main content

Security report for zanemagone.com

Zane Magone · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zane Magone is a professional photographer based in Latvia, specializing in event, corporate, brand, and portrait photography. The website serves as a portfolio showcasing various photography projects and provides contact information for potential clients. The business targets individuals and companies within Latvia, offering localized photography services. Technically, the website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as HTTPS, Google Fonts, and reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, though some security headers could be added to enhance protection. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner present but no visible privacy policy or terms of service pages. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and suitable for its business purpose but could improve in privacy transparency and security header implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zanemagone.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small, essential entity in the photography sector, focusing on the Latvian market. It leverages a portfolio-based business model to attract clients through visual content. The website's integration with Instagram supports marketing efforts and client engagement. The lack of detailed company registration or certification information limits deeper business intelligence insights. The business appears to maintain a straightforward service offering without complex partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth potential is tied to local market demand for professional photography services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, protecting data in transit. Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms helps mitigate spam and automated abuse. However, the absence of several security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but could be enhanced to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add missing security headers including Content Security Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and trust.
  4. Consider publishing a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly review and update website security measures and privacy compliance to align with evolving standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zane Magone
Description
Profesionāla fotogrāfe - pasākumu, uzņēmumu un zīmolu fotografēšana. Fotosesijas Siguldā un visā Latvijā.
Key services
Event photography, Corporate photography, Brand photography, Portrait sessions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Fonts, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Squarespace platform
Platforms
Squarespace hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional photography portfolio for a Latvian photographer named Zane Magone.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some English meta tags.
  3. Site uses Squarespace CMS and hosting.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  6. Contact phone number is provided with Latvian country code.
  7. Social media presence on Instagram is linked.
  8. No WHOIS data available, domain registration status unclear.
  9. No security policy or incident response information found.
  10. No certifications or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, which provides a stable and modern CMS environment. It uses Google Fonts for typography and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site loads a variety of compressed JavaScript and CSS assets to optimize performance. Mobile responsiveness is well implemented, and the site includes accessibility features such as skip links. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, typical for a Squarespace site with rich media content. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by implementing additional security headers and ensuring domain registration transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zanemagone.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zanemagone.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.