Skip to main content

Security report for zakaz.global

Whois privacy protection service · Other · Ukraine

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zakaz Global appears to be a small-scale or emerging business with a website built on the Weblium platform and hosted via Cloudflare. The site content is minimal, with a generic tagline 'Nothing is strange with us' and lacks detailed business descriptions, contact information, or legal policies. The technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript frameworks and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, indicating some level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, but lacks advanced security disclosures or policies. Privacy compliance is poor due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site presents moderate risk due to limited transparency and missing compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zakaz.global

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind zakaz.global is not clearly identified beyond the WHOIS privacy protection service. The domain is registered in Ukraine since 2019, suggesting a relatively new entity. The website targets a global audience but does not specify its market position, business model, or key services. Absence of contact details and legal policies limits trust and credibility. The use of tracking pixels and analytics suggests an intent to monitor user behavior for marketing purposes. No partnerships or certifications are disclosed, indicating a standalone operation with limited public business intelligence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare for CDN and security, which provides a baseline of protection. Security headers such as HSTS and X-Frame-Options are present, enhancing security against common web attacks. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page reduces transparency and incident response readiness. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The site does not provide any security or incident response contact information, which is a gap in security culture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a user consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  3. Implement DNSSEC to strengthen domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Improve website content quality and navigation clarity to enhance user experience and SEO performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Whois privacy protection service
Description
Nothing is strange with us
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cloudflare
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client Transfer Prohibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found on main page
  3. No explicit contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found
  4. Website uses Weblium CMS and Cloudflare for hosting and CDN
  5. Tracking scripts for Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are present
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. WHOIS data shows privacy protection and domain status clientTransferProhibited
  8. Content is minimal with a generic description and no detailed business info
  9. No certifications or security frameworks mentioned
  10. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including React and Weblium CMS, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. Hosting via Cloudflare provides performance benefits and security features. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, SEO metadata is minimal and accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with some scripts loaded asynchronously. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Technical debt appears low but the site would benefit from enhanced metadata and structured data for better search engine visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zakaz.global. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zakaz.global.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.