Skip to main content

Security report for zadov.cz

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.sportsumava.cz appears to be a sports or outdoor activity related site hosted on the Wix platform. The site uses Wix's Thunderbolt framework and includes third-party tracking scripts such as Facebook Pixel and Smartlook for analytics and user behavior tracking. However, the site lacks visible business information, contact details, and privacy or cookie policies, which limits its transparency and trustworthiness. The WHOIS data is unavailable, suggesting privacy protection or domain registration issues, which further impacts the legitimacy assessment. Technically, the site is moderately optimized for mobile devices but lacks important security headers and comprehensive privacy compliance features. Overall, the site presents a basic digital presence with significant room for improvement in security, privacy, and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zadov.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of explicit business information, the market positioning and business model cannot be clearly determined. The site likely targets sports enthusiasts or outdoor activity participants in the Czech Republic, given the language and domain. The lack of contact information and policies suggests a small or informal business operation. The use of Wix indicates a low-cost, easy-to-manage web presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the domain or content. The site does not demonstrate advanced digital marketing or trust-building features, which may limit growth and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a positive security baseline. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, exposing it to common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing immediate risk from injection attacks, but the presence of third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a gap in security readiness. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to protect user data and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS to improve security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts for vulnerabilities and minimize tracking to respect user privacy.
  5. Consider registering WHOIS information transparently or justify privacy protection to improve domain legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix, JavaScript, Core-js, Focus-within-polyfill, Intl-segmenter polyfill, Smartlook
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Smartlook
Marketing tools
Smartlook
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and polyfills.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service detected on the homepage HTML.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  5. No security headers detected, which is a security concern.
  6. Uses third-party tracking scripts including Facebook Pixel and Smartlook.
  7. Content is minimal and mostly technical scripts and styles, with no visible business or contact information.
  8. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph meta tags found in the provided HTML snippet.
  10. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using the Thunderbolt framework, which provides a modern JavaScript and CSS infrastructure. It includes polyfills for browser compatibility and uses Smartlook for user session recording and Facebook Pixel for marketing analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, the site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features beyond basic levels. Performance is moderate due to the use of multiple external scripts and resources. The absence of structured data and meta tags limits search engine visibility. Technical debt appears low given the managed platform, but security and privacy technical implementations need significant improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zadov.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zadov.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.