Skip to main content

Security report for zadosti.cz

CNL INVEST s.r.o. · Telecommunications · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CNL INVEST s.r.o. operates the website zadosti.cz, providing an online service for submitting requests to verify the existence of electronic communication networks in the Czech Republic. The company acts as an authorized representative for multiple network owners, issuing official statements regarding network locations. The service targets businesses and individuals requiring official confirmation of network existence for planning or regulatory purposes. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content, though it lacks published privacy and cookie policies. Technically, the site uses the Yii PHP framework with jQuery and Blueprint CSS, hosted on Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and CSRF protection but lacks important security headers and incident response information. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business profile, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zadosti.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche market within the telecommunications sector in the Czech Republic, providing a specialized service that facilitates official verification of network existence. Its business model involves charging fees for issuing statements on behalf of multiple network owners. The website's clear presentation of authorized network owners and transparent contact information supports credibility. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and limited marketing or analytics tools suggests a focused, service-oriented approach rather than aggressive customer acquisition. The company appears to be small-sized, founded in 2016, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple network owners represented by CNL INVEST s.r.o. Strategic observations indicate a stable, specialized service provider with potential to enhance digital maturity and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and CSRF tokens implemented in forms. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates gaps in compliance with GDPR and related regulations. While no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, the security posture would benefit from implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing incident response mechanisms to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to broaden user reach and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Consider integrating analytics and monitoring tools with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user behavior and improve service.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CNL INVEST s.r.o.
Registration number
28522648
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CNL INVEST s.r.o.
Description
CNL INVEST s.r.o. is authorized to represent multiple electronic communication network owners and administrators to issue statements regarding the existence of networks. The website provides an online service for submitting requests to verify the existence and location of electronic communication networks relative to areas of interest.
Key services
Issuance of statements on existence of electronic communication networks, Online submission of requests with mapping of interest areas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Yii Framework, Blueprint CSS
Frameworks
Yii Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • CSRF token present in form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a specialized service for electronic communication network existence verification.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are published on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer with company address, phone, and email.
  4. Site uses Yii PHP framework and jQuery for frontend interactivity.
  5. No social media links or analytics services detected.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts found except a chat widget from fastcom.servicedesk.net.
  7. Site content is in Czech language and targets Czech businesses and individuals.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; security posture can be improved.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Yii PHP framework with jQuery and Blueprint CSS for styling, indicating a moderately modern technology stack. Hosting is via Microsoft Azure DNS, suggesting reliable infrastructure. The site uses asynchronous loading for a chat widget, improving user interaction without blocking page load. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The form includes CSRF protection, indicating attention to secure input handling. Opportunities exist to modernize front-end technologies, enhance SEO with structured data, and improve accessibility compliance to reduce technical debt and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zadosti.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zadosti.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.