Skip to main content

Security report for youtube.com

Google LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

YouTube, owned by Google LLC, is the world's leading online video sharing and streaming platform. It offers users the ability to watch, upload, and share videos globally, supported by a robust advertising model. The platform targets a broad general audience and maintains a dominant market position in the technology and media sectors. Its business model revolves around content creation, distribution, and monetization through advertising and premium services. Technically, YouTube employs a modern web infrastructure leveraging JavaScript frameworks such as Polymer and Web Components, hosted on Google Cloud Platform. The website is optimized for performance, accessibility, and mobile responsiveness, ensuring a seamless user experience across devices. The platform integrates extensive analytics and marketing tools, primarily from Google, to support its advertising ecosystem. From a security perspective, YouTube demonstrates a strong posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. Privacy compliance is robust, with detailed policies and consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, direct contact information for security or incident response is not publicly disclosed, which is typical for large platforms. Overall, YouTube presents a low-risk profile with high trustworthiness, excellent technical implementation, and strong business credibility. Strategic recommendations include maintaining continuous security audits, enhancing transparency in data retention policies, and exploring public vulnerability disclosure channels to further strengthen trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of youtube.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching youtube.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention youtube.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,057,278
Employees
19
Customers
1,055,418
Third parties
1,841
Weak passwords
17%

Latest record dated 2026-06-12 · 560 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for youtube.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –youtube.com2026-06-12
  • –youtube.com2026-05-25
  • –www.youtube.com2026-05-24
  • –www.youtube.com2026-05-21
  • –youtube.com2026-05-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate youtube.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
240
Registered
240
Resolving
240
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • yo•••••.comMediumreplacement
  • yo•••••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • yo•••••.comMediumbitsquatting

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of youtube.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

YouTube operates as a critical subsidiary of Google LLC, leveraging Google's extensive infrastructure and market reach. It holds a competitive advantage as the largest video platform globally, with diversified revenue streams including advertising, premium subscriptions, and content partnerships. The platform serves a wide demographic, from casual viewers to professional content creators, fostering a vast ecosystem of users and advertisers. Growth indicators include continuous feature enhancements, expansion into new content formats like Shorts, and integration with Google's advertising and analytics services. Partnerships with content creators and advertisers are central to its ecosystem, while strategic observations highlight the importance of balancing content moderation with user engagement.

Security posture

YouTube exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and no exposed sensitive data in the analyzed HTML content. The platform employs best practices in web security and data protection, supported by Google's global security infrastructure. Compliance with GDPR is evident through comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. However, the absence of publicly accessible incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure programs suggests an opportunity for enhanced transparency. The extensive use of tracking and analytics is balanced with user consent mechanisms, reflecting a responsible approach to privacy. Overall, the security maturity aligns with enterprise standards, minimizing business impact from potential vulnerabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicize a dedicated vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Enhance transparency around data retention policies and user data management in privacy documentation.
  3. Maintain continuous security audits and timely updates of third-party libraries to mitigate emerging threats.
  4. Provide clearer public contact channels for security incidents to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Continue investing in user privacy controls and consent mechanisms to strengthen compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google LLC
Description
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
Key services
Video sharing, Video streaming, Content creation platform, Advertising platform
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Polymer, Web Components, HTML5, CSS3, Google APIs
Frameworks
Polymer
Platforms
Web, Desktop, Mobile
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Marketing Platform
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is not publicly available, typical for large tech companies using privacy or registrar protection.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  4. Strong security posture with HTTPS and security headers.
  5. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found publicly.
  8. Content is safe for general audiences.
  9. Advertising and analytics are extensive but transparent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website utilizes a sophisticated technology stack centered on modern JavaScript frameworks such as Polymer and Web Components, ensuring modularity and performance. Hosting on Google Cloud Platform provides scalability and reliability. The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization and accessibility features, contributing to a high-quality user experience. SEO practices are well implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is optimized with preloading strategies and asynchronous script loading. Technical risks are minimal, with no deprecated or vulnerable libraries detected in the provided content. Opportunities exist to further modernize by adopting emerging web standards and enhancing progressive web app capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100 +6Low22 findingsView report
  2. 75/100 −3Medium26 findingsView report
  3. 78/100 −7Low24 findingsView report
  4. 85/100 −1Low20 findingsView report
  5. 86/100Low19 findingsView report
  6. 86/100 +3Low19 findingsView report
  7. 83/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with youtube.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review youtube.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.