Skip to main content

Security report for youtube.com

Google LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

YouTube, owned by Google LLC, is the world's leading online video sharing and streaming platform, serving a global audience with diverse content ranging from entertainment to education. The platform operates on a robust advertising-based business model complemented by premium subscription services. Its market position is dominant, supported by a vast user base and extensive content library. Technically, YouTube employs a modern and scalable infrastructure leveraging Google's cloud services, advanced JavaScript frameworks like Polymer, and comprehensive web technologies to deliver fast, accessible, and mobile-optimized experiences. The site demonstrates high digital maturity with strong SEO, accessibility, and performance optimizations. From a security perspective, YouTube enforces HTTPS, implements strong security headers, and follows best practices to protect user data and platform integrity. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting a mature approach to data protection and user privacy. Overall, YouTube presents a low-risk profile with high trustworthiness, excellent content quality, and strong business credibility. Strategic recommendations include maintaining continuous security audits, enhancing incident response transparency, and further strengthening privacy compliance to adapt to evolving regulations.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of youtube.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching youtube.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention youtube.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,057,278
Employees
19
Customers
1,055,418
Third parties
1,841
Weak passwords
17%

Latest record dated 2026-06-12 · 560 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for youtube.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –youtube.com2026-06-12
  • –youtube.com2026-05-25
  • –www.youtube.com2026-05-24
  • –www.youtube.com2026-05-21
  • –youtube.com2026-05-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate youtube.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
240
Registered
240
Resolving
240
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • yo•••••.comMediumreplacement
  • yo•••••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • yo•••••.comMediumbitsquatting

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of youtube.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

YouTube's market leadership is underpinned by its vast content ecosystem and integration within Google's advertising and cloud infrastructure. Its competitive advantages include brand recognition, technological innovation, and a diversified revenue model combining ads and subscriptions. The platform targets a broad demographic, including individual content creators, advertisers, and general consumers worldwide. Growth indicators include continuous feature enhancements, global expansion, and partnerships with content creators and media companies. The partnership ecosystem is extensive, involving Google services and third-party advertisers, reinforcing its market dominance.

Security posture

YouTube exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. The platform lacks publicly visible incident response or security policy pages, which is typical for large enterprises that manage these internally or via dedicated channels. Compliance with GDPR and cookie consent mechanisms indicates attention to regulatory requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The security culture appears robust, though transparency on incident response could be improved.

Recommendations

  1. Enhance public visibility of security policies and incident response procedures to build user trust.
  2. Maintain up-to-date third-party libraries and conduct regular vulnerability assessments.
  3. Continue evolving privacy compliance measures in line with global regulations.
  4. Implement more accessible contact channels for security and abuse reporting.
  5. Invest in user education on privacy and security best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google LLC
Description
YouTube is a global online video sharing and social media platform that allows users to watch, upload, share, and comment on videos. It offers a wide range of content including music, entertainment, education, and user-generated content.
Key services
Video hosting, Video streaming, Content monetization, Advertising platform, Premium subscriptions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Polymer, Web Components, HTML5, CSS3, Google APIs
Frameworks
Polymer
Platforms
Web, Desktop, Mobile
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy
  • Secure cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Marketing tools
Google Optimize
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich and professionally presented.
  3. Strong security posture with modern headers and HTTPS.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  6. Uses advanced web technologies and Google infrastructure.
  7. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Technical notes

Notes

YouTube's technical infrastructure is highly advanced, utilizing Google's cloud hosting and modern web technologies such as Polymer and Web Components. The site is optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility. SEO practices are well implemented with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. The use of service workers and caching strategies enhances user experience. Technical risks are minimal, with no deprecated or vulnerable libraries detected. Opportunities exist to further improve transparency and developer documentation for external stakeholders.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100 +6Low22 findingsView report
  2. 75/100 −3Medium26 findingsView report
  3. 78/100 −5Low24 findingsView report
  4. 83/100 −3Low20 findingsView report
  5. 86/100Low19 findingsView report
  6. 86/100 +3Low19 findingsView report
  7. 83/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with youtube.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review youtube.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.