Skip to main content

Security report for xxxmoviesbox.cc

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website xxxmoviesbox.cc operates as an adult entertainment platform offering a wide range of explicit pornographic videos categorized by various adult genres. It targets an adult-only audience and relies on free content streaming supported by advertising and affiliate partnerships. The site supports multiple languages and links to numerous partner adult sites, indicating a networked business model within the adult content niche. Technically, the site uses basic web technologies including jQuery and custom CSS/JS, with no advanced frameworks or CMS detected. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO and accessibility features. However, there is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or advanced security headers, which poses risks to user security and privacy. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is provided, indicating poor compliance with privacy and security best practices. Overall, the site is functional but lacks professionalism and security maturity, resulting in a low trustworthiness rating.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xxxmoviesbox.cc

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site occupies a niche in the adult entertainment market, offering free pornographic video content with extensive categorization and multi-language support. Its business model appears to be advertising-driven with affiliate partnerships, as evidenced by numerous external partner links and embedded ad scripts. The lack of company information, contact details, or legal disclosures suggests an anonymous or loosely managed operation typical in this sector. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its broad content variety and partner ecosystem. However, the absence of privacy and security policies, as well as minimal technical sophistication, may limit growth and expose it to regulatory risks. The partner network is extensive, indicating a strategy of cross-promotion within adult content sites.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no indication of HTTPS enforcement or presence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are provided, and no contact information for security incidents or abuse is found. The site uses third-party advertising scripts which may introduce additional risks. The lack of vulnerability disclosure or incident response mechanisms further reduces security maturity. These gaps expose users to potential data interception, tracking without consent, and lack of recourse in case of security incidents. The site should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and transparent privacy and security policies to improve its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with HSTS to secure user connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  3. Publish terms of service and contact information including security incident channels.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and incident response process.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website offering free adult pornographic videos categorized by various explicit genres.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Adult content categorization, Affiliate referrals
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, line-awesome icons, custom CSS/JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
trusttraff.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult entertainment portal with extensive pornographic video categories.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact information or security policies are provided.
  4. Site uses jQuery and custom CSS/JS with no modern frameworks detected.
  5. External links mostly point to other adult content partner sites.
  6. Advertising is present via trusttraff.com scripts.
  7. No HTTPS or security headers information available; likely lacking advanced security measures.
  8. Content is mature/adult only with explicit keywords and no age gating.
  9. No social media or company contact emails found.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) detected beyond basic meta tags.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack primarily based on jQuery and custom CSS/JS. No modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, indicating a basic technical infrastructure. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO meta tags. Performance appears moderate but could be improved with modern frontend technologies and optimization. The lack of HTTPS and security headers is a significant technical risk. The site relies on external advertising scripts from trusttraff.com, which may impact performance and security. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but outdated and lacking in security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xxxmoviesbox.cc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xxxmoviesbox.cc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.