Skip to main content

Security report for xxiivv.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Echorridoors' hosted at xxiivv.com is an artistic and experimental project with a focus on ambient and creative content. It references artists and collaborators but does not present itself as a commercial business. The site is minimalistic, with a black background, SVG logo, ambient audio, and links to a wiki and a webring, indicating a niche community or collective. The domain is well established, created in 2008, and hosted on Media Temple servers, suggesting stable infrastructure. Technically, the site uses basic HTML5, CSS3, and SVG graphics with audio autoplay. There is no evidence of modern frameworks or CMS platforms. The site has basic mobile optimization and accessibility but lacks advanced SEO and security headers. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by domain and hosting but not explicitly confirmed), but DNSSEC is not enabled. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is provided. The absence of security headers and policies reduces the overall security posture. However, no vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. Overall, the site is low risk but lacks many standard compliance and security features expected for commercial or data-sensitive websites. Strategic improvements include adding privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, implementing security headers, and providing contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xxiivv.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the creative and artistic sector, likely targeting enthusiasts of experimental music and digital art. It does not appear to have a traditional business model or revenue streams. The site serves as a hub for a niche community with links to related projects and collaborators. The lack of commercial content or e-commerce functionality suggests a non-commercial or hobbyist operation. The domain's long age indicates sustained interest or legacy presence in its niche. Partnerships appear limited to related artistic collectives. Growth indicators or market positioning are not evident from the content.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is low to moderate. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long registration period, which is positive. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in security best practices. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. There is no evidence of compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. The site does not use tracking or analytics, minimizing privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a low-risk artistic site but would require enhancements for commercial or sensitive data use.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the site against common web attacks.
  3. Add a clear privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Provide contact information or a dedicated security contact for incident response and transparency.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be an artistic or creative project with a thematic description 'A ghost enters the Library.' It references names such as aliceffekt, traumae, devine lu linvega, which may be artists or collaborators. The site links to a wiki and a webring, suggesting a community or collective focus rather than a commercial business.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, SVG, CSS3, Audio autoplay
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is artistic and minimalistic with limited content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms present.
  4. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  6. Domain is well aged and registered with a known registrar.
  7. Site uses Media Temple name servers indicating professional hosting.
  8. No signs of adult or explicit content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with simple HTML5 and CSS3, using SVG for vector graphics and an audio element for ambient sound. There is no evidence of JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. Hosting is provided by Media Temple, a reputable provider. The site has basic meta tags for description and keywords but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. Performance is likely moderate given minimal content but could be improved with modern optimization techniques. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO is minimal with no sitemap or robots.txt references. The site is static and lightweight but could benefit from modernization and enhanced technical SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xxiivv.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xxiivv.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.