Skip to main content

Security report for xtapes.in

XTAPES PORN · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

XTAPES.IN is an adult entertainment website specializing in free streaming and downloading of high-definition pornographic videos, including 4K content. The platform aggregates and indexes content from various sources, targeting an adult audience interested in diverse adult video categories. The site operates on WordPress CMS with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. It leverages multiple third-party ad networks and tracking services to monetize traffic. While the site enforces HTTPS and some security headers, it lacks comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as clear contact or incident response information. The domain uses privacy protection for WHOIS data, which is typical for adult content sites but reduces transparency. Overall, the site provides a functional adult content streaming service but has gaps in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xtapes.in

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the adult entertainment market as a free porn tube and video aggregator. Its business model relies on advertising revenue through multiple ad networks and tracking technologies. The site targets adult users seeking free access to a wide range of adult video content, including popular categories and networks. The presence of partner links such as 'theporndude.com' indicates an affiliate or partnership ecosystem. The lack of explicit business registration or contact details suggests a small-scale operation focused on content aggregation rather than original production. Growth indicators include frequent new video uploads and a broad category offering. However, the absence of privacy and security policies may impact user trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated abuse. A Content-Security-Policy header is present but limited to upgrading insecure requests. There is no evidence of advanced security headers such as HSTS or X-Frame-Options. The site lacks published security policies, vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, or incident response contacts, which are critical for mature security management. The extensive use of third-party ad and tracking scripts introduces potential privacy and security risks. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting comprehensive security policies and enhanced HTTP headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  3. Add detailed terms of service and security policy documents to enhance transparency and legal compliance.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, abuse reports, and general inquiries to build trust.
  5. Enhance HTTP security headers including HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
XTAPES PORN
Description
XTAPES.IN - The Number One Porn Tube For Best 4K and Full HD Porn Videos. Watch, Download & Share XXX scenes and Movies every day for free! Featuring worlds best Pornstars & cam models of the Adult Industry.
Key services
Free streaming of adult videos, Video downloads, Content indexing and linking
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.26, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, bxSlider, Cloudflare (implied by scripts and headers), Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • Content-Security-Policy header present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
SamplePerson, Lazumi, Dezna, O333o, Tapioni
Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content streaming and indexing platform
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact or security incident reporting information available
  4. Heavy use of third-party ad networks and tracking scripts
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with several plugins
  6. Content is fully accessible with no WAF blocking
  7. Security headers are minimal but HTTPS is enforced
  8. Content is clearly adult and NSFW
  9. No explicit business registration or company info found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.9.26, utilizing common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Google reCAPTCHA v3. The tech stack includes jQuery and bxSlider for UI components. The site is served over HTTPS with Cloudflare CDN likely in use, improving performance and availability. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Mobile optimization is good with responsive CSS and navigation. However, the site relies heavily on third-party ad networks and tracking scripts, which may impact performance and privacy. The HTML and CSS appear valid with no major errors. Opportunities exist to modernize the CMS version and reduce third-party dependencies to improve security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xtapes.in. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xtapes.in.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.