Skip to main content

Security report for xetnet.fi

XetNET · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

XetNET is a Finnish-based hosting and domain registration company established in 2002, offering a range of web hosting solutions including webhotelli packages, virtual servers, Docker services, and business email. The company emphasizes local Finnish hosting infrastructure and customer service, positioning itself as a reliable and performance-oriented provider in the Finnish market. Their website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and service descriptions. Technically, the site uses WordPress with modern technologies such as LiteSpeed Cache, PHP 8.x, Redis, and Docker, ensuring good performance and scalability. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that complies with GDPR. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency. Overall, the site reflects a mature, trustworthy business with good digital maturity and compliance practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xetnet.fi

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention xetnet.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
24
Employees
0
Customers
24
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for xetnet.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

XetNET operates in the technology sector focusing on web hosting and domain services targeted primarily at Finnish businesses and individuals. Their competitive advantage lies in local hosting, Finnish language support, and transparent pricing. The affiliate program indicates a growth strategy leveraging partner networks. The company maintains active content marketing through a blog and customer testimonials, reinforcing trust and engagement. Partnerships with Stripe for payments and CookieInformation for privacy compliance demonstrate integration with reputable service providers. The business model is subscription-based with additional services such as DNS and email. Market positioning is that of a trusted local provider with a focus on performance and reliability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and a detailed cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy and GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts is controlled, and privacy policies are comprehensive. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and may affect trust for security-conscious customers. The company should consider publishing these documents and providing a dedicated security contact to improve incident response readiness and compliance with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to increase transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear contact information for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to comply with GDPR transparency requirements.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize privacy risks and security vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user education on data retention and processing practices to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
XetNET
Description
XetNET on suomalainen webhotelli- ja verkkotunnusvälittäjä, joka tarjoaa edullisia ja suorituskykyisiä hosting-ratkaisuja kuten webhotellit, virtuaalipalvelimet, Docker-palvelut ja yrityssähköpostin.
Key services
Webhotelli Pro, Webhotelli Forte, Docker-palvelut, Virtuaalipalvelin, Verkkotunnukset, Yritysposti
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, LiteSpeed Cache, PHP 8.0/8.1/8.2, Docker, Redis, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, CookieInformation cookie consent
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web hosting, Cloud services
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies
  • Security headers present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MetricsCube
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories and descriptions.
  3. Strong emphasis on Finnish origin and local hosting.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices.
  5. Clear business focus on hosting and domain services with transparent pricing and offerings.
  6. Active blog with recent posts indicating ongoing business activity.
  7. Affiliate program present to encourage partner growth.
  8. No visible security or privacy policy pages explicitly labeled, but privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive.
  9. No explicit terms of service or incident response policies found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including PHP 8.x, LiteSpeed Cache, Redis, and Docker for scalable hosting solutions. Performance is optimized with caching and CDN technologies. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with appropriate ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Security headers and HTTPS configuration are robust, contributing to a secure browsing experience. The use of external services like Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and CookieInformation is well integrated with user consent mechanisms. Technical risks are minimal, but continuous monitoring and updates are recommended to maintain security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xetnet.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xetnet.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.