Skip to main content

Security report for xerox.com

Xerox Corporation · Technology · United States

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Xerox Corporation is a globally recognized enterprise specializing in workplace solutions, document management, and digital printing technologies. The company serves a broad range of industries including education, legal, financial services, healthcare, government, and retail, offering products such as printers, multifunction devices, digital presses, software, and managed print services. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and consistent branding, targeting business customers and partners worldwide. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools such as New Relic, Google Tag Manager, and Adobe Launch, hosted likely on Microsoft Azure infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. However, a critical security gap is the absence of HTTPS/SSL on the main domain, exposing users to potential risks and undermining trust. Security posture is weak due to lack of SSL/TLS and missing security headers like HSTS, though some content security policies are in place. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Business credibility is high, supported by extensive corporate information, partner programs, and trust signals. Overall, the site is professionally designed and content-rich but requires urgent security improvements to enable HTTPS and strengthen SSL configurations to protect users and maintain enterprise trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xerox.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Xerox holds a strong market position as a leader in printing and document management solutions, with a diversified portfolio addressing multiple sectors. Their business model focuses on B2B services, including hardware sales, software solutions, managed print services, and IT consulting. The company leverages partnerships and subsidiaries such as Lexmark (pending acquisition) and CareAR to expand capabilities. Revenue streams are diversified across product sales, service contracts, and digital transformation offerings. The website's extensive content and partner portals indicate a mature ecosystem supporting global operations and customer engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture of xerox.com is concerning due to the absence of HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement for any modern website, especially for an enterprise of this scale. The lack of SSL/TLS encryption exposes users to interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. Additionally, the site lacks HSTS and other recommended security headers, reducing protection against protocol downgrade attacks and clickjacking. While the content security policy restricts framing to trusted domains, the overall security configuration is insufficient. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could impact transparency and trust. Immediate remediation is necessary to align with industry best practices and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate across all domains and subdomains immediately.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Update server configuration to support modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3) and strong cipher suites.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to enhance transparency.
  5. Add security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Content-Security-Policy enhancements.
  6. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
  7. Enhance incident response contact channels with dedicated security email addresses.
  8. Maintain and publish data retention and privacy policies aligned with GDPR and other regulations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end framework, likely React or a proprietary Xerox framework (XDS). It integrates advanced analytics and monitoring tools including New Relic, Google Tag Manager, Adobe Launch, and Siteimprove Analytics. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure, inferred from IP addresses. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance metrics are not explicitly provided but inferred as moderate due to rich content and multiple external resources. The absence of SSL/TLS is a major technical deficiency. The site employs multiple external links to partner and subsidiary domains, indicating a complex ecosystem. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a large enterprise website but requires security upgrades and performance monitoring enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xerox.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xerox.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.