Skip to main content

Security report for xecurify.com

miniOrange · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website login.xecurify.com/moas/login serves as a secure login portal for miniOrange, a company specializing in identity and access management solutions such as Single Sign-On and Multi-Factor Authentication. The portal is designed for business and enterprise users requiring secure authentication services. The site uses modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Select2, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, the page is minimalistic, focusing solely on login functionality without additional content such as privacy or cookie policies. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cache-control headers to prevent sensitive data caching. The login form includes CSRF tokens, enhancing security. Nonetheless, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and Referrer-Policy represents an area for improvement. No signs of WAF or security challenge blocking were detected, allowing full content access. WHOIS data for the subdomain login.xecurify.com is unavailable, which is typical for subdomains. The main domain xecurify.com likely holds the registration. The branding and technical setup align with a legitimate business operation. The lack of privacy and cookie policies on this login page reduces privacy compliance scores. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture and good business credibility but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security header implementations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xecurify.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
90
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention xecurify.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4,424
Employees
13
Customers
4,354
Third parties
57
Weak passwords
13%

Latest record dated 2026-05-21 · 138 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for xecurify.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –idpdemo.xecurify.com2026-05-21
  • –branding.xecurify.com2025-09-19
  • –login.xecurify.com2025-08-27
  • –team.xecurify.com2025-08-19
  • –team.xecurify.com2025-07-31

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

miniOrange operates in the technology sector, providing identity and access management solutions primarily targeting businesses and enterprises. Their business model is B2B SaaS, focusing on secure authentication services such as SSO and MFA. The company maintains a consistent brand presence with a professional login portal. The partnership with the main domain www.miniorange.com indicates a centralized service ecosystem. The absence of direct contact information on the login page suggests that customer engagement is likely handled through the main website. The company appears to be medium-sized with a stable market position in IAM solutions.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses anti-caching headers to protect sensitive login data. The login form includes CSRF tokens, indicating awareness of common web security threats. However, the absence of critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and Referrer-Policy reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerable or outdated libraries were detected, and no exposed sensitive data was found in the HTML. The site lacks visible incident response or security policy information, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be strengthened with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, and HSTS headers to enhance security.
  2. Add visible privacy and cookie policies on the login portal or link prominently to the main site policies.
  3. Include contact information or links to support for incident response and user assistance.
  4. Regularly audit third-party libraries and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.
  5. Consider adding security and compliance certifications or trust badges to improve user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
miniOrange
Description
miniOrange provides identity and access management solutions including login, authentication, and security services.
Key services
Single Sign-On (SSO), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), Identity Management
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.2, jQuery 3.7.1, jQuery Migrate 3.4.1, Select2 4.1.0-rc.0, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Google Fonts (Inter, DM Sans, Lexend Deca), Remixicon 2.5.0
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No-cache headers to prevent caching of sensitive pages
  • Use of CSRF tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for miniOrange identity and access management services.
  2. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain, which is expected behavior.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this login page.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers visible on this page.
  5. Uses modern frontend libraries and frameworks.
  6. No security headers detected beyond HTTPS and cache control.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Content is professional and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely adopted frontend technology stack including Bootstrap 5.3.2, jQuery 3.7.1, and Select2 for enhanced UI components. Google Fonts and icon libraries such as Font Awesome and Remixicon are used for consistent branding and visual appeal. The site is mobile responsive and loads external resources from reputable CDNs, contributing to moderate performance. The HTML is well-structured with proper meta tags for viewport and cache control. However, the site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features beyond basic implementation. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xecurify.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xecurify.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.