Skip to main content

Security report for ww.ee

OÜ Wõrgu Wõlurid / Web Wizards LLC · Technology · Estonia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ww.ee represents a small Estonian technology-related company operating under the names OÜ Wõrgu Wõlurid and Web Wizards LLC. The business appears to provide web or IT services, targeting both Estonian and English-speaking clients. The domain is well-established since 2010 and hosted by Zone Media OÜ, consistent with the company's location and language. The website content is minimal but accessible, providing basic contact information in two languages. Technical infrastructure is simple, relying on standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. From a security perspective, the site lacks critical security headers and published policies such as privacy, cookie, or terms of service, which indicates compliance gaps and potential risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal user tracking, which is positive for privacy but also indicates limited marketing sophistication. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the website's claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website scores moderately on business credibility but falls short on privacy compliance and security posture. The lack of published policies and security best practices presents risks that should be addressed to improve trust and regulatory compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, policy publication, and incident response readiness are recommended to enhance the site's security and compliance maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ww.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company behind ww.ee operates in the technology sector, likely providing web or IT services given the company names and domain. The business targets local Estonian clients and English-speaking customers, suggesting a bilingual service offering. The business model appears to be service-oriented with a small company size and no visible subsidiaries or parent companies. The domain age of over a decade indicates a stable presence. The lack of marketing or social media presence suggests a focus on direct client relationships rather than broad digital marketing. The company is hosted by Zone Media OÜ, a local Estonian hosting provider, reinforcing its local market focus. No certifications or trust badges are displayed, which may limit competitive advantage in larger markets.

Security posture

The website's security posture is basic and lacks several important elements. HTTPS status is unknown but assumed given the domain and registrar; however, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are detected, which are critical for modern web security. No forms or input fields are present that require secure handling, reducing immediate risk. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting the company's ability to respond to security incidents effectively. Overall, the security maturity is low, and improvements are necessary to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to address GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is enforced with a strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  4. Add incident response contact information and a vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security readiness.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
OÜ Wõrgu Wõlurid / Web Wizards LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OÜ Wõrgu Wõlurid / Web Wizards LLC
Description
The website represents a company named OÜ Wõrgu Wõlurid (in Estonian) and Web Wizards LLC (in English), located in Tallinn, Estonia. The business appears to be technology-related, likely providing web or IT services given the company name and domain.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in both Estonian and English.
  4. No social media or external links detected.
  5. Minimal technical sophistication; basic HTML/CSS/JS with no CMS or frameworks detected.
  6. No security headers or advanced security practices observed.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is well-established.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The hosting provider is Zone Media OÜ, consistent with the domain registrar and nameservers. Performance is moderate with no indications of advanced optimization or CDN usage. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags present. No analytics or tracking technologies are detected, indicating minimal data collection. The technical infrastructure is simple and stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ww.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ww.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.