Skip to main content

Security report for wvnderlab.com

wvnderlab · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

wvnderlab is a Hamburg-based digital agency specializing in web design, SEO, online marketing, and e-commerce solutions. The company positions itself as a full-service provider offering tailored digital marketing strategies and professional website development to help businesses grow their online presence. Their website reflects a mature digital infrastructure with modern technologies such as WordPress, Yoast SEO, and cookie consent management, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and anti-spam protections, though there is room for improvement in HTTP security headers and formal security policies. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and GDPR compliant, supporting a trustworthy business image.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wvnderlab.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wvnderlab.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for wvnderlab.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets small to medium-sized businesses seeking comprehensive digital marketing and web development services. Their business model focuses on customized solutions rather than fixed-price packages, emphasizing quality and client-specific needs. The presence of multiple client references and testimonials suggests a solid market position within the Hamburg region. Social media integration and active content marketing via a blog indicate ongoing engagement strategies. The lack of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified to ensure trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of anti-spam and cookie consent tools. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The site uses CAPTCHA mechanisms to protect forms, reducing spam risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Add and configure HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and compliance.
  4. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider implementing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
wvnderlab
Description
Ihre Digitalagentur für Webseiten - Onlineshops - SEO Suchmaschinenoptimierung - SEA Google Ads - Social Media Marketing - JETZT BERATEN LASSEN
Key services
Strategie & Konzept, Webdesign, Onlineshop, Online Marketing, Suchmaschinenoptimierung, Logo & Brand Design
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Conditionizr, Borlabs Cookie, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-Spam protection via CleanTalk
  • Cookie consent management via Borlabs Cookie
  • Use of reCAPTCHA and Turnstile for form protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie, CleanTalk Anti-Spam
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Professional digital agency website with comprehensive service offerings.
  3. Strong presence of GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies.
  4. Multiple contact methods including email, phone, and contact form.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for an active commercial website.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery and Conditionizr for feature detection. It uses Borlabs Cookie for GDPR-compliant cookie management and CleanTalk for anti-spam protection. The site is optimized for performance with autoptimize caching and lazy loading of images. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO Premium. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with clear navigation and structured content. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is robust with minor areas for security enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wvnderlab.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wvnderlab.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.