Skip to main content

Security report for wpproatoz.com

WP Pro A to Z · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WP Pro A to Z is a specialized WordPress service provider offering website design, maintenance, SEO, and boutique hosting services. The company emphasizes personalized client interaction, tutorials, and transparent communication to help clients maintain and grow their online presence. Their market position is that of a niche boutique provider targeting small to medium businesses and individuals seeking quality WordPress solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Elementor, Slider Revolution, and WooCommerce, supported by Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent management via Usercentrics. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and domain protection statuses set, though DNSSEC is not enabled and formal security policies are absent. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for SEO and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wpproatoz.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates primarily in the technology sector, focusing on WordPress-related services including hosting, design, SEO, and maintenance. Their business model is service-oriented with revenue streams likely from hosting subscriptions, consultation fees, and design projects. The company maintains partnerships with related domains such as wpproatozhost.com for hosting and wppluginsatoz.com for podcasting. Client testimonials and affiliate disclosures enhance credibility. The company is relatively new, founded in 2022, and targets a niche market with personalized service offerings. Growth indicators include active content updates, SEO optimization, and integration of modern marketing and analytics tools.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes protective statuses against unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which is a compliance gap. The use of Usercentrics for consent management and the presence of privacy and cookie policies indicate attention to privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing formal security and incident response policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WP Pro A to Z
Description
WP Pro A to Z offers WordPress website design, maintenance, SEO services, and boutique hosting. They provide personalized interaction, tutorials, and real answers to clients' questions. Their services include WPPro Maintenance Program, Speedy & Secure Boutique Hosting, Next Level SEO and Design, and consultation services.
Key services
WordPress Website Design, WordPress Maintenance, SEO Services, Boutique WordPress Hosting, Consultation Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Slider Revolution, WooCommerce, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Usercentrics Consent Management
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client-side consent management via Usercentrics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, Conversion Bridge
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WordPress service provider with a focus on maintenance, SEO, hosting, and design.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and calls to action.
  3. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent management.
  5. Affiliate disclosure is transparent.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. Security policies and incident response information are not explicitly provided.
  8. Domain registration is recent but consistent with business age.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress infrastructure using Elementor for page building and Slider Revolution for dynamic content. WooCommerce is present, indicating e-commerce capabilities. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity, with consent managed by Usercentrics. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets asynchronously or deferred to optimize performance. Hosting appears to be managed or affiliated with wpproatozhost.com, a boutique hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and incomplete security headers. Overall, the technical stack is robust and suitable for the business needs but can benefit from incremental security and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wpproatoz.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wpproatoz.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.