Skip to main content

Security report for wpivilnius.lt

VRS WPI Vilnius, UAB · Other · Lithuania

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VRS WPI Vilnius, UAB is a Lithuanian brand development consultancy established since 1992, specializing in brand strategy, identity, packaging, and communication services. The company targets businesses worldwide seeking to enhance brand equity and market positioning through coherent and resilient branding solutions. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with interactive design elements and clear contact information. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks such as Livewire and Alpine.js, along with Swiper.js for UI interactions, and is optimized for mobile devices with good SEO practices. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, and no explicit security headers were detected, suggesting room for improvement in security posture. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification, but the website content and social media presence support legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on business credibility and technical implementation but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wpivilnius.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wpivilnius.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for wpivilnius.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the brand development sector, focusing on strategic consultancy and creative services. Their market positioning leverages a long history since 1992, targeting global clients from their base in Vilnius, Lithuania. The business model centers on consultancy and creative service delivery rather than product sales. The presence of a dedicated subdomain for works and rebranding indicates a structured service offering and marketing approach. Contact details and social media links support client engagement and trust. The lack of visible certifications or security policies suggests a small to medium enterprise with limited formal compliance frameworks. Growth potential lies in expanding digital presence and enhancing compliance to meet international standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are present, limiting transparency. The use of modern frameworks reduces risk of legacy vulnerabilities, but security best practices such as CSP and HSTS should be implemented. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small consultancy but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Conduct a security audit to verify SSL/TLS configuration and remediate any weaknesses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
VRS WPI Vilnius, UAB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VRS WPI Vilnius, UAB
Description
We grow brand equity through excellence in brand coherence, resilience, and longevity, working from our office in Vilnius and all over the world.
Key services
Brand strategy, Brand identity design, Packaging solutions, Communication and advertising platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Livewire, Alpine.js, Swiper.js, Spline Viewer, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Livewire, Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address
  4. No forms detected on the site for data collection
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  6. Modern frontend technologies used with good mobile optimization
  7. No visible security headers or explicit SSL/TLS info in provided data
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, and YouTube
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack including Livewire and Alpine.js for reactive components, Swiper.js for vertical slide navigation, and Spline Viewer for 3D content integration. Google Fonts and external CSS/JS are loaded via trusted CDNs. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and interactive UI elements. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and preloading of critical assets. No broken links or errors were observed in the HTML content. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and SEO further by adding ARIA attributes and structured data. Hosting provider and SSL details are not disclosed in the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wpivilnius.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wpivilnius.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.