Skip to main content

Security report for wp-hosting.cz

WP Hosting ® - IT & WP HOST s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WP Hosting ®, operated by IT & WP HOST s.r.o., is a Czech-based hosting provider specializing in fast WordPress hosting solutions. The website presents a professional and modern design targeting WordPress users seeking reliable hosting services. The company appears to focus on the Czech market with localized content and services tailored for WordPress websites. The technical infrastructure leverages common web technologies including WordPress CMS, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are not detected, indicating potential compliance gaps. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces trustworthiness but does not negate the professional presentation of the site. Overall, the site is functional and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wp-hosting.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
82
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, specifically in web hosting services for WordPress platforms. Its business model is service-oriented, providing hosting infrastructure and IT support to WordPress site owners. The market positioning is local and niche-focused, targeting Czech WordPress users. The website content and design suggest a small-sized enterprise with a professional approach. The absence of detailed business registration data and contact information limits deeper business intelligence insights. The use of third-party analytics and chat services indicates an intent to engage customers and monitor site performance. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the content. The company could improve market presence by publishing more transparent business and compliance information.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options are detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, nor a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Tawk.to chat introduces potential privacy considerations. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities are apparent from the content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations, which is a significant security and legal gap. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WP Hosting ® - IT & WP HOST s.r.o.
Description
WP Hosting provides fast hosting services specialized for WordPress websites.
Key services
WordPress hosting, IT services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, FontAwesome, jQuery, Rocket Loader (possibly WP Rocket), Tawk.to chat widget, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap (CSS classes detected)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Connect
Marketing tools
Tawk.to chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable or privacy protected.
  2. Website is a professional WordPress hosting provider targeting Czech market.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Uses common third-party services for fonts, analytics, and chat support.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS and uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Fonts for typography, and FontAwesome for icons. It integrates third-party services such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Tawk.to for analytics and customer support. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility basics. Performance appears moderate, with preconnect and preload hints for fonts and scripts to improve loading times. However, no advanced caching or CDN details are evident. The absence of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. The site would benefit from enhanced technical controls and documentation to support security and privacy requirements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wp-hosting.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wp-hosting.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.