Skip to main content

Security report for workcast.com

WorkCast · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WorkCast operates a professional and comprehensive digital event platform specializing in webinars, virtual events, and webcasts with enterprise-level support. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking scalable and customizable webinar solutions, offering a robust SaaS platform with extensive engagement features and integrations. The website is built on HubSpot CMS, leveraging modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics 4 and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front with clear business information and active social media presence, supporting a high legitimacy score despite the absence of WHOIS data for the subdomain, which is typical. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching workcast.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
60
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention workcast.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
61
Employees
2
Customers
42
Third parties
17
Weak passwords
10%

Latest record dated 2026-04-20 · 4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for workcast.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –secure.workcast.com2026-04-20
  • –secure.workcast.com2025-07-22

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WorkCast holds a solid market position in the webinar and virtual event software industry, focusing on enterprise clients with customizable templates, engagement tools, and integration capabilities. Their business model is SaaS-based with additional professional services and support. The company demonstrates strong branding consistency and content quality, supported by a well-structured website and active social media channels. The presence of a free trial and demo booking options indicates a customer-centric approach. The lack of explicit company registration or VAT information on the site is a minor gap but does not detract from overall credibility. The company’s ecosystem includes integrations with major platforms, enhancing its competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable third-party analytics and marketing scripts, which are standard security best practices. Cookie consent and privacy policies align with GDPR requirements, reflecting good privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and a dedicated security policy page suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, which could be a concern for security-conscious clients. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by formalizing security policies and disclosure programs.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility compliance to improve inclusivity and meet regulatory standards.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WorkCast
Description
WorkCast is a powerful digital event platform with enterprise-level support offering webinars, hybrid & virtual events, with features to increase attendance and engagement.
Key services
Webinar software, Virtual events platform, Hybrid events, Webcast platform, Event engagement features, Integrations and APIs, Professional services and support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, jQuery 1.11.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Facebook Ads Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS platform
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Google Analytics 4
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and well-structured.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of HubSpot CMS and marketing tools indicates modern marketing infrastructure.
  5. No direct WHOIS data for subdomain, which is expected.
  6. Multiple contact options and social media presence enhance trust.
  7. No security policy or incident response info publicly found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 1.11.2 and modern marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics 4. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO optimization and structured data implemented via JSON-LD for organization and contact information. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and rich media content. The technical implementation is solid with room for improvement in accessibility and security header deployment. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but likely managed by HubSpot infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with workcast.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review workcast.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.