Skip to main content

Security report for woopra.com

Woopra · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Woopra is a technology company specializing in customer journey and product analytics software. Their platform enables businesses to track and analyze user behavior across marketing, sales, product, and support touchpoints, providing actionable insights to improve customer acquisition and retention. The website positions Woopra as a trusted analytics provider with a professional and modern digital presence, targeting product, marketing, sales, and support teams. The company offers a SaaS model with integrations and real-time engagement capabilities. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. HTTPS is enforced, and the site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site performs moderately well with good accessibility and user experience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks published security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure programs. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are found, limiting immediate communication channels. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing from the VeriSign database, which is unusual and slightly reduces trustworthiness, though the website content and branding are consistent and professional. Overall, Woopra presents a credible and professional analytics platform with a solid technical foundation but could improve transparency in security policies and domain registration information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of woopra.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching woopra.com

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Woopra operates in the competitive SaaS analytics market, focusing on end-to-end customer journey analytics. Their competitive advantage lies in unifying data across multiple touchpoints and enabling real-time user engagement. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with free plans and paid tiers. The target customers are medium to large enterprises with product, marketing, sales, and support teams needing deep analytics. The presence of major customer logos indicates strong market acceptance. The company maintains a well-structured website with clear navigation and content relevant to its audience. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified. Growth indicators include continuous content updates and integration expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent compliance, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published security or incident response policies suggest room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy and transparency. The site does not provide a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program, limiting external security communication. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to enhance transparency and trust with customers and security researchers.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide direct contact information for security and support inquiries, including dedicated security and abuse email addresses.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Woopra
Description
Analyze and visualize the entire customer journey from first marketing touch to product usage. Sign up for our free plan today.
Key services
Customer Journey Analytics, Product Analytics, Data Unification, Real-time Engagement, Integrations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Typekit Fonts, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced via script redirect
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Woopra Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with enforced redirect
  2. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  3. No exposed emails or phone numbers found in HTML
  4. Contact available via contact form only
  5. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for a commercial domain
  8. Website content is business-focused and professional
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with asynchronous loading of scripts such as Google Tag Manager and OneTrust cookie consent. Fonts are loaded via Adobe Typekit. The site enforces HTTPS via client-side redirect. The presence of cookie consent scripts indicates compliance with privacy regulations. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Performance appears moderate with optimized images and SVG graphics. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical stack is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low25 findingsView report
  2. 81/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with woopra.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review woopra.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.