Skip to main content

Security report for woopra.com

Woopra · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Woopra is a technology company specializing in customer journey and product analytics software. Their platform enables businesses to track and analyze user behavior across marketing, sales, product, and support touchpoints, providing actionable insights to improve customer acquisition and retention. The company positions itself as a trusted analytics provider with a strong presence among industry giants, offering a SaaS model with extensive integrations and real-time engagement capabilities. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for cookie consent, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, with professional design and clear navigation. Security-wise, Woopra enforces HTTPS, implements key security headers, and provides comprehensive privacy and cookie policies compliant with GDPR. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and security culture. The WHOIS data is notably missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a reputable business and should be monitored for potential risks. Overall, Woopra presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with a solid security posture but could enhance its compliance and incident readiness disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of woopra.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching woopra.com

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Woopra operates in the competitive analytics SaaS market, targeting product, marketing, sales, and support teams seeking end-to-end customer journey insights. Their business model revolves around subscription-based software with a free plan to attract users. The company leverages a broad integration ecosystem and real-time automation to differentiate itself. Market positioning is strong, supported by recognizable customer logos and domain verifications. Revenue streams likely include tiered subscription plans and enterprise contracts. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled lead capture via forms. Growth indicators include active content updates, blog, documentation, and resource sections. Partnerships and integrations with major platforms enhance their ecosystem. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved security transparency and WHOIS data clarity to bolster trust further.

Security posture

Woopra demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement, modern security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. The site avoids exposing sensitive data and uses reputable third-party analytics and tracking services. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure channels limits transparency and may hinder rapid incident handling. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance with privacy regulations is evident but could be strengthened by explicit security governance disclosures. The security culture appears professional but would benefit from enhanced communication of security practices and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but not exemplary.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security frameworks and practices.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Woopra
Description
Analyze and visualize the entire customer journey from first marketing touch to product usage. Sign up for our free plan today.
Key services
Customer Journey Analytics, Product Analytics, Data Unification, Real-time Engagement, Integrations with 50+ services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Typekit Fonts, OneTrust Cookie Consent, SVG graphics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Woopra Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on customer journey and product analytics SaaS
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages; contact via form
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
  6. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may warrant further investigation
  7. Multiple third-party scripts for analytics and tracking detected
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Good SEO and mobile optimization observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with SVG graphics and asynchronous loading of analytics and tracking scripts. Google Tag Manager and OneTrust are integrated for marketing and privacy compliance. The site enforces HTTPS and includes multiple security headers, indicating good technical hygiene. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in loading large SVG animations. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags are well implemented. No CMS or hosting provider was explicitly detected. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and provide more detailed technical documentation for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100 +1Low25 findingsView report
  2. 80/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with woopra.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review woopra.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.