Skip to main content

Security report for wolfram.at

Wolfram Bergbau und Hütten AG · Manufacturing · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

47/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wolfram Bergbau und Hütten AG is a medium-sized Austrian company specializing in the mining, refining, and recycling of tungsten-based products. It holds a strong market position as a leading global supplier of high-quality tungsten powders. The company operates multiple sites including mining in Mittersill, refining in St. Martin, and recycling centers in Austria and India. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with the Divi theme and includes comprehensive content in German and English, targeting industrial clients and potential employees. Technically, the site uses modern SEO and analytics tools but suffers from a critical lack of valid SSL/TLS configuration, impacting security posture. Privacy compliance is well implemented with GDPR-aligned cookie consent mechanisms and a detailed privacy policy. Business credibility is supported by ISO certifications and transparent contact information. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but requires urgent security improvements to enable HTTPS and modern TLS protocols.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wolfram.at

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
47

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company benefits from its affiliation with Sandvik, a global industrial group, as indicated by DNS and SPF records. Its business model integrates primary tungsten ore mining with secondary raw material recycling, emphasizing sustainability and circular economy principles. The presence of multiple ISO certifications (45001, 9001, 14001) highlights commitment to quality, safety, and environmental management. The website content and structure support clear communication of products, services, and career opportunities, indicating a mature digital presence. The company targets industrial sectors requiring tungsten powders and related products, with a focus on innovation and net zero goals. Partnerships and subsidiaries in India and Austria support global operations. The company’s digital ecosystem includes social media channels and a cookie-compliant analytics setup, reflecting a balanced approach to marketing and privacy.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is weakened by the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing users to risks of data interception and undermining trust. While several security headers are present (HSTS, X-Frame-Options, CSP), the lack of HTTPS negates many benefits. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found on the site. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy demonstrate good GDPR compliance, but the technical security gaps are critical. The site does not implement OCSP stapling or session resumption, which could improve performance and security. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues is essential to protect user data and maintain compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated versions.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to enhance security and performance.
  4. Enhance Content Security Policy to cover more directives and reduce attack surface.
  5. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Wolfram Bergbau und Hütten AG
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on a WordPress CMS with the Divi theme and uses common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Borlabs Cookie for privacy management. It employs jQuery and custom JavaScript for UI enhancements. The hosting infrastructure appears linked to Sandvik, a reputable industrial group. Performance metrics indicate slow loading times, possibly due to missing caching or optimization. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility is basic but adequate. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema. The lack of SSL/TLS is a major technical deficiency. Overall, the technical stack is modern but requires security upgrades and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wolfram.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wolfram.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.