Skip to main content

Security report for wizdom-intranet.com

LiveTiles · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LiveTiles is a technology company specializing in intranet software solutions designed for global enterprise organizations. Their platform aims to enhance workforce engagement, unify distributed and hybrid teams, and improve internal communication and productivity. The company positions itself as a key player in the digital workplace solutions market, targeting large enterprises with a focus on collaboration and innovation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, leveraging modern marketing and analytics tools such as Microsoft Clarity, Marketo, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager. The site is hosted with reputable providers and uses Cloudflare DNS, ensuring good performance and security. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and security incident response information indicates room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, showing a legitimate and consistent online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wizdom-intranet.com

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LiveTiles operates in the enterprise software sector, focusing on intranet and digital workplace solutions. Their business model revolves around providing SaaS-based collaboration tools to large organizations, enabling better communication and productivity among hybrid and distributed teams. The company leverages partnerships and integrates with marketing automation and analytics platforms to enhance customer engagement and lead generation. Market positioning is strong within the enterprise segment, with a clear emphasis on innovation and employee engagement. The website content and design reflect a professional and consistent brand image, supporting their credibility. Growth indicators include active marketing and analytics deployments, but lack of detailed contact information and compliance documentation may impact trust with some enterprise clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and the use of Cloudflare DNS adds a layer of DNS security, although DNSSEC is not enabled. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers and published security policies, including incident response and vulnerability disclosure, suggests gaps in security governance and transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site uses multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts, which may increase the attack surface and privacy risks if not properly managed. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing website but should be enhanced to meet enterprise compliance standards fully.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and document security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy, including security contact channels.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve site performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LiveTiles
Description
LiveTiles provides intranet software solutions purpose-built for global enterprise organizations to engage workforce, unite distributed and hybrid teams, drive innovation, boost productivity, and streamline internal communication.
Key services
Intranet software, Digital workplace solutions, Employee engagement, Internal communication tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Marketo, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), Marketo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
StackAdapt
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics via GTM
Marketing tools
Marketo, Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service found on main page or scripts
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot
  4. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts present
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and domain is not privacy protected
  8. Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other protections
  9. DNSSEC not enabled
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, utilizing a modern tech stack including JavaScript libraries and marketing automation tools like Marketo and Microsoft Clarity. Hosting and DNS are managed through reputable providers (GoDaddy and Cloudflare). The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site lacks some advanced security configurations such as security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but has opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wizdom-intranet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wizdom-intranet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.