The website wisconsinbids.us is a Chinese language platform primarily promoting lottery and gambling applications for Android and Apple devices. It offers app download links, rankings, and recommendations targeting a mature audience interested in gambling. The business appears small and niche, with limited transparency and no visible privacy or security policies. Technically, the site uses an older ThinkPHP framework and jQuery 1.11.1, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is weak, lacking HTTPS enforcement and security headers, and no GDPR or privacy compliance is evident. The WHOIS data reveals a registrant organization based in Bangladesh unrelated to the website content, raising trust concerns. Overall, the site presents moderate risk due to content type, lack of compliance, and registrant mismatch.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention wisconsinbids.us, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for wisconsinbids.us right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The platform operates as an app distribution and promotion service for lottery and gambling apps, monetizing likely through affiliate downloads or advertising. Its target market is Chinese-speaking users interested in gambling apps. The site maintains a broad network of partner links mainly related to VPNs and accelerators, possibly to facilitate access to geo-restricted content. The business model relies on traffic and app downloads rather than direct sales. Growth indicators are unclear due to lack of business data. The partnership ecosystem includes numerous accelerator and VPN sites, some suspicious or adult-themed, which may impact reputation.
Security posture
Security maturity is low with no visible HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies. The site does not disclose incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The WHOIS registrant mismatch and presence of suspicious external links further reduce trust. Data protection practices are not evident, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The site is vulnerable to potential attacks due to outdated libraries and lack of security best practices.
Recommendations
Implement HTTPS with HSTS and ensure all site content is served securely.
Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance indicators.
Publish clear contact information and business transparency details.
Enable DNSSEC and add security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Conduct a security audit to update libraries and remove suspicious or unrelated external links.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
App download links for Android and Apple platforms, Recommendations and rankings of lottery-related apps
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate
Technology
Stack
jQuery 1.11.1, Unslider, Matomo Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
ThinkPHP (detected from trace and file paths)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
30/100
Analytics and tracking
Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
Content is primarily Chinese language lottery and gambling app promotion.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
No contact information or business transparency details provided.
Numerous external links to accelerators, VPNs, and suspicious domains including adult content sites.
Technical stack is outdated with jQuery 1.11.1 and ThinkPHP framework.
No security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected in provided data.
Content safety is questionable due to gambling content and suspicious external links.
WHOIS data shows mismatch between registrant and website content.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on ThinkPHP framework with jQuery 1.11.1 and uses Unslider for UI components. Analytics are provided by Matomo. DNS is managed via Cloudflare but DNSSEC is not enabled. The site shows moderate performance but lacks modern SEO and accessibility features. Mobile optimization is basic. The code includes asynchronous loading of scripts and some dynamic UI elements. However, the technology stack is outdated and lacks modern security and performance optimizations, indicating technical debt and modernization opportunities.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with wisconsinbids.us. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wisconsinbids.us.