Skip to main content

Security report for wirtschaft-buenztal.ch

Wirtschaftsförderung Bünztal · Government · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wirtschaftsförderung Bünztal is a regional economic development organization focused on strengthening the economic location factors and competitiveness of the Bünztal region in Switzerland. The organization supports business development, company settlement, and networking among companies, investors, and municipalities. The website is built on the Contao CMS platform and uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Masonry, with Google Tag Manager integrated for analytics. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and relevant content for its target audience of regional businesses and investors. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wirtschaft-buenztal.ch

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a government/non-profit entity serving 11 municipalities in the Bünztal region, focusing on economic promotion and business support. Its business model revolves around regional development services including location promotion, funding advice, networking facilitation, and project support. The website targets local businesses, investors, and municipal stakeholders. The presence of LinkedIn and WhatsApp channels indicates moderate digital engagement. No direct revenue streams or commercial activities are evident, consistent with a public-sector or non-profit mandate. The organization maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and relevant content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a GDPR compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Wirtschaftsförderung Bünztal
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wirtschaftsförderung Bünztal
Description
Die Wirtschaftsförderung Bünztal engagiert sich für die Stärkung der wirtschaftlichen Standortfaktoren, der regionalen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und der Entwicklung, Erweiterung und Ansiedlung von Unternehmen.
Key services
Standortförderung, Fördermittelberatung, Vernetzung von Unternehmen und Behörden, Projektbegleitung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Masonry, imagesLoaded, Google Tag Manager, Lottie Player
Frameworks
Contao CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targeted at regional businesses and investors.
  3. No cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR relevance.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policies published.
  6. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and CMS (Contao).
  7. Includes Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking.
  8. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn and WhatsApp.
  9. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via email or linked pages.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Contao CMS, a well-known open-source content management system, combined with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Masonry, and imagesLoaded for layout and interactivity. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, indicating a moderate level of digital marketing sophistication. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features such as skip navigation links. Performance is moderate, with optimized images and asynchronous script loading. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wirtschaft-buenztal.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wirtschaft-buenztal.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.