Skip to main content

Security report for wins.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at https://www.audacy.com/1010wins is currently inaccessible to users in the European Union, displaying only a minimal message indicating unavailability. This suggests geo-blocking or regional content restrictions likely enforced by a web application firewall or compliance mechanism. The lack of accessible content prevents a thorough analysis of the business, technical infrastructure, or security posture. The WHOIS lookup for the domain www.audacy.com returned no match, indicating either the domain is not registered under this exact name, is newly registered, or uses privacy protection that obscures registrant details. Consequently, no registrar, creation date, expiry date, or registrant information could be extracted, limiting trust and legitimacy assessments. Technically, the site shows no metadata, scripts, or external links in the provided HTML snippet, and no security headers or HTTPS information were available for review. This absence of data, combined with the geo-blocking message, results in a very low AI score and an inability to evaluate compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. No contact information, privacy policies, cookie banners, or terms of service were found, further reducing the site's transparency and trustworthiness. From a security perspective, the lack of accessible content and missing WHOIS data are significant concerns. Without HTTPS or security headers, the site would be vulnerable if accessible. The geo-blocking may be a deliberate measure to comply with regional regulations or restrict access, but it also impedes external security and compliance assessments. Overall, the site currently presents a high risk due to lack of transparency and accessibility. Strategically, it is recommended that the site owners improve transparency by publishing clear privacy and cookie policies, providing contact information, and ensuring WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available. Implementing HTTPS and security headers is critical to protect users and improve trust. Removing or clarifying geo-blocking restrictions would enable broader access and facilitate compliance verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wins.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
25
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and absence of WHOIS data, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain www.audacy.com appears to be associated with a media or broadcasting entity based on the URL path '1010wins' (a known radio station), but no direct business details, market positioning, or operational insights are available from the provided data. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or revenue models can be identified. The lack of contact or corporate information limits understanding of the company's structure or market presence.

Security posture

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the minimal content and lack of accessible technical data. No HTTPS or security headers were detected, which are fundamental for secure web operations. The geo-blocking message suggests some form of access control, but no details on incident response, vulnerability disclosure, or security policies are available. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Overall, the site exhibits a low security maturity level with significant gaps in transparency and user protection.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Provide clear contact information and business details to enhance trust.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Review and clarify geo-blocking or regional restrictions to improve accessibility and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Minimal HTML content with message 'This site isn't currently available in the EU' indicates geo-blocking or content restriction likely enforced by a WAF or regional compliance mechanism. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and blocked for EU visitors.
  2. No metadata, scripts, or external links detected in provided HTML.
  3. No contact or business information available on the page.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable or domain is not registered under the queried name.
  5. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS information available.
  7. Site likely uses geo-blocking or regional restriction mechanisms.
  8. Analysis limited due to lack of accessible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The provided HTML content is minimal and lacks metadata, scripts, or any detectable technologies. No CMS, frameworks, or hosting providers could be identified. The absence of performance or accessibility features suggests the site is either under maintenance, geo-blocked, or intentionally restricted. The lack of SEO optimization and mobile responsiveness indicators further confirms a low level of technical maturity. Without WHOIS data, domain registration and hosting infrastructure remain unknown.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wins.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wins.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.