Skip to main content

Security report for wingstelecom.ro

Wings Telecom is under construction · Other · Romania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

27/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Wings Telecom website is currently under construction and provides no substantive content about the business, its services, or contact information. The site uses WordPress with an under construction plugin and Bootstrap for styling, hosted on a LiteSpeed server with DNS managed by romarg.com. The lack of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support significantly undermines the site's security posture. Basic security headers are present but insufficient to protect against modern threats. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are available, indicating poor compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. Overall, the website is not yet ready for public use and lacks essential trust and security features. From a technical perspective, the site shows minimal digital maturity with no performance data available and basic mobile optimization. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests no active user engagement or marketing efforts. The DNS and mail configurations appear standard and legitimate, but the lack of content and security measures limits business credibility. Security evaluation highlights critical issues including no HTTPS, no HSTS, and no certificate transparency compliance. These gaps expose users to potential data interception and reduce trustworthiness. The absence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure information further indicates immature security practices. In summary, Wings Telecom's website is in an early development stage with significant improvements needed in content, security, and compliance before it can be considered a reliable and professional online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wingstelecom.ro

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
0
Average
27

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Wings Telecom appears to be a telecommunications-related business based in Romania, inferred from the domain and DNS data. However, the website currently lacks any business description, service listings, or contact details, making it impossible to assess market positioning, competitive advantages, or revenue streams. The use of WordPress and common plugins suggests a small-scale operation or early-stage business. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The absence of marketing or analytics tools implies limited digital marketing efforts. Overall, the business intelligence is minimal due to the lack of publicly available information.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical vulnerability. While some security headers like X-XSS-Protection and X-Content-Type-Options are present, they are insufficient alone to ensure robust security. No advanced protections such as HSTS, OCSP stapling, or certificate transparency are implemented. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies or incident response contacts, indicating low security maturity. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also suggests non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. These factors collectively expose the site and its users to potential risks and reduce trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and properly configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Add clear contact information and business details to improve credibility and user trust.
  4. Enhance security headers by adding Content-Security-Policy, Referrer-Policy, and enabling HSTS with preload.
  5. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security readiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using an under construction plugin and Bootstrap framework for styling. It is hosted on a LiteSpeed server with DNS managed by romarg.com. The site currently lacks HTTPS support due to an invalid or missing SSL certificate, which is a major technical deficiency. No modern TLS protocols or cipher suites are enabled. Performance metrics are unavailable, but the minimal content and lack of optimization suggest slow loading times. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced SEO or metadata present. The technical infrastructure is functional but immature, requiring modernization and security enhancements to support a professional business presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wingstelecom.ro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wingstelecom.ro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.