Skip to main content

Security report for wild.at

WILD GmbH · Manufacturing · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WILD GmbH is a well-established Austrian technology partner specializing in contract development and manufacturing of optomechatronic systems, serving sectors such as medical technology, in-vitro diagnostics, optical metrology, laboratory, laser, and semiconductor technology. The company has a strong market position with decades of experience and multiple subsidiaries, offering comprehensive services including development, production, and supply chain management. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support, professional design, and rich content tailored to their target audience of technology and healthcare companies. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, hosted on infrastructure associated with a1.net. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility. Security headers and SSL configurations are robust, with HSTS, CSP, and XSS protections in place, although some improvements like enabling HSTS preload and DMARC records are recommended. The security posture is strong with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well managed through Borlabs Cookie consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy. Contact information is clear and detailed, supporting business credibility. Overall, the website scores highly in content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility, indicating a trustworthy and professional online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wild.at

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
18
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WILD GmbH operates in specialized manufacturing and technology sectors, focusing on optomechatronic systems for medical, laboratory, and semiconductor industries. Their business model centers on contract manufacturing and development partnerships, leveraging deep technical expertise and process reliability. The company maintains a medium size with approximately 510 employees and multiple locations in Austria and Slovakia. Their market positioning is supported by strong customer testimonials, published brochures, and compliance documentation. The company targets B2B clients requiring high precision and quality in technology-driven products. Their partnership ecosystem includes subsidiaries and external partners like kwf.at. Growth indicators include active news updates and participation in industry events. The website supports multilingual audiences, enhancing international reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS with a long max-age and includeSubDomains directive, X-Frame-Options set to SAMEORIGIN, X-Content-Type-Options nosniff, and a restrictive Content Security Policy. OCSP stapling is enabled, enhancing certificate validation performance. No vulnerable cipher suites or protocols were detected. However, the HSTS preload flag is not enabled, and DMARC records are missing, representing minor gaps in email and transport security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be improved. Overall, the site follows best practices for web security, minimizing risks of common web attacks and data exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HSTS preload flag to strengthen HTTPS enforcement across browsers.
  2. Implement a DMARC DNS record to improve email authentication and reduce phishing risks.
  3. Consider enabling DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies with dedicated contact channels.
  5. Review and tighten Content Security Policy to eliminate 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' directives where feasible.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
WILD GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.4.2, utilizing popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, WPBakery Page Builder for content layout, Borlabs Cookie for GDPR-compliant cookie management, and WPML for multilingual support. The server runs Apache with HTTP/2 support. DNS is managed via a1.net with no DNSSEC enabled. SSL certificates cover multiple subdomains and support TLS 1.3, 1.2, and 1.1 protocols with OCSP stapling enabled. Performance is fast with no reported loading delays. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with semantic HTML and ARIA landmarks. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, supporting a professional and secure user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wild.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wild.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.