Skip to main content

Security report for wikixl.nl

ArchiXL B.V. · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ArchiXL B.V. operates a specialized semantic wiki knowledge management platform called WikiXL™, targeting organizations that require structured and unstructured content management solutions. The company positions itself as a niche provider in the Dutch market offering SaaS-based platforms built on open source MediaWiki technology, complemented by consulting and training services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and social media presence. Technically, the platform uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Flatpickr, Matomo analytics, and Google Tag Manager, ensuring good mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and privacy-conscious analytics, though the absence of explicit security headers and privacy/cookie policies indicates room for improvement. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wikixl.nl

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ArchiXL's market positioning as a provider of semantic wiki platforms and enterprise architecture tools suggests a focused business model catering to knowledge management and information architecture sectors. Their revenue streams likely include SaaS subscriptions, customization services, and training programs. The company maintains a clear partnership ecosystem, including references to cultural heritage knowledge bases. Growth indicators include a comprehensive product suite and active social media engagement. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen market trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of privacy-respecting analytics (Matomo). However, the lack of published privacy and cookie policies, absence of security headers, and missing incident response contact details represent compliance and operational gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The organization should prioritize publishing comprehensive privacy documentation, implementing security headers, and establishing clear incident response channels to improve security maturity and GDPR/NIS2 compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ArchiXL B.V.
Registration number
KvK 05084421
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ArchiXL B.V.
Description
WikiXL™ is een semantisch wikiplatform waarmee gegevens, informatie en kennis eenvoudig kunnen worden gedeeld binnen en buiten uw organisatie. Het platform structureert, combineert en ontsluit content in diverse vormen, gebaseerd op open source software en aangeboden as a Service.
Key services
WikiXL™ kennismanagementplatform, ArchiMedes™ architectuurpublicatieplatform, BegrippenXL™ thesaurusplatform, Enterprise architecture consulting, Information and data modeling, Training and education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
MediaWiki (open source wiki platform), jQuery, Flatpickr, Matomo analytics, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Platforms
MediaWiki
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with no visible vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused, describing a semantic wiki knowledge management platform.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, address, and contact form.
  5. Use of Matomo analytics indicates privacy-conscious tracking.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML response headers (not provided but inferred).
  7. Terms of service document is available as a PDF in the footer.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter (X), and Mastodon.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  10. No data protection officer contact found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a customized MediaWiki platform enhanced with jQuery and Flatpickr for UI components. Analytics are handled via Matomo and Google Tag Manager, balancing functionality with privacy considerations. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts and asynchronous script loading. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incomplete privacy documentation indicate technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but requires enhancements in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wikixl.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wikixl.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.