Skip to main content

Security report for wierengareclame.nl

Wierenga Reclame · Other · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wierenga Reclame is a Dutch advertising agency specializing in affordable advertising solutions including website creation, design, printing, and marketing services. The company positions itself as a comprehensive intermediary offering a complete concept managed by one company. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, with a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers in place, but lacks explicit privacy and terms of service documentation. Contact is primarily via a web form, with no direct emails or phone numbers visible. Overall, the website reflects a small, established business with consistent branding and a clear service offering.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wierengareclame.nl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets small to medium businesses in the Netherlands seeking affordable advertising and website services. Founded in 2002, it has a long-standing presence consistent with its domain age. The business model is service-oriented, acting as an intermediary coordinating specialists in various advertising disciplines. The website showcases a portfolio and emphasizes affordability and comprehensive service. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy documentation may limit trust for some users.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and includes standard security headers, indicating a baseline security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML. However, the absence of a privacy policy, terms of service, and security incident response information suggests gaps in compliance and incident readiness. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, reducing privacy risks but also limiting marketing insights. The site would benefit from adding formal security and privacy documentation and explicit contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit company contact emails and phone numbers on the website for transparency and support.
  3. Implement a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Incorporate SEO best practices including meta tags and structured data to improve search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wierenga Reclame
Description
Wierenga Reclame is a Dutch advertising/intermediary agency offering affordable advertising services including website creation, design, DTP, printing, texts, photography, and internet marketing. They position themselves as a complete concept provider with a team of affordable specialists.
Key services
Website creation, Design, DTP, Printing, Texts, Photography, Internet marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Google Fonts, jQuery (custom usage)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Dutch and targeted at local businesses.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active.
  5. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in HTML.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and Google Fonts.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML snippet.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  10. No certifications or security policies mentioned.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, leveraging Google Fonts and custom jQuery scripts. The HTML is valid and well-structured with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with no heavy external scripts detected. The site uses standard security headers and HTTPS, indicating good technical hygiene. However, no advanced analytics or marketing tools are present, and there is room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. Hosting provider details were not identified from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could be enhanced with modern SEO and accessibility standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wierengareclame.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wierengareclame.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.