Skip to main content

Security report for widencollective.com

Acquia · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Acquia operates a community platform hosted on Salesforce Experience Cloud, focusing on digital asset management and customer engagement. The site leverages multiple modern payment and analytics technologies, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The platform is well-integrated with trusted third-party services such as Stripe, PayPal, Adyen, Google Analytics, and Mixpanel, supporting a robust e-commerce and community experience. Security is well addressed with HTTPS and a strict Content-Security-Policy, although additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, which should be addressed to meet regulatory requirements. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy front for Acquia's community services.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of widencollective.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Potential Subdomain Takeover

      Subdomain api.acquia.com points to unregistered service mc-22549-1974247437.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com

      What to do: Remove or fix CNAME record to prevent subdomain takeover

      • WSTG-CONF-10
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching widencollective.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Acquia is positioned as an enterprise technology company specializing in digital experience and asset management solutions. The community site targets developers, marketers, and digital asset managers, supporting B2B SaaS business models. The integration with Salesforce and multiple payment gateways suggests a strong partnership ecosystem and a focus on seamless customer experience. The lack of explicit contact information and privacy policies on the community site may indicate reliance on the main corporate site for such details. The company likely benefits from a large enterprise footprint with consistent branding and professional content quality.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy restricting resource loading to trusted domains. The use of Salesforce's embedded services and secure payment integrations further strengthens security. However, the absence of additional security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Privacy compliance gaps, especially missing privacy and cookie policies, present compliance risks. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available on the site, which could hinder transparency and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy on the community site to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Implement additional security headers including HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing security policies and incident response contacts to increase transparency and user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Acquia
Description
Acquia provides a community platform likely focused on digital asset management and related services.
Key services
Digital Asset Management, Community Support, Customer Engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Salesforce Embedded Service, Stripe JS, PayPal SDK, Adyen Checkout, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Widencdn, Mixpanel, Formstack API
Frameworks
Salesforce Lightning Web Components, SLDS (Salesforce Lightning Design System)
Platforms
Salesforce Experience Cloud
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Strict Content-Security-Policy
  • Use of HTTPS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Mixpanel
Marketing tools
Mixpanel, Formstack
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Salesforce Experience Cloud community site for Acquia.
  2. No WHOIS data for the subdomain, indicating it is likely managed under a parent domain.
  3. Strong use of third-party payment and analytics services.
  4. Good security practices with CSP and HTTPS.
  5. No privacy or cookie policy detected in the provided content.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML snippet except LinkedIn domain referenced in scripts.
  9. Content is professional and technology oriented.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The site is built on Salesforce Experience Cloud using Lightning Web Components and SLDS for UI consistency. It integrates multiple third-party services for payments (Stripe, PayPal, Adyen) and analytics (Google Analytics, Mixpanel). The hosting infrastructure appears to be Salesforce and AWS-based, providing scalability and reliability. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and structured data for the website. The site uses modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous loading for improved user experience. Opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and performance further by optimizing scripts and improving compliance with accessibility standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with widencollective.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review widencollective.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.