Skip to main content

Security report for whyservices.net

Whyservices OÜ · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Whyservices OÜ is a small Estonian technology company specializing in custom system administration, application hosting, and IT infrastructure consulting. Their website presents a professional image with clear service offerings including infrastructure consulting, Wordpress hosting via WellPress, containerized application hosting via WellHost, and Ruby on Rails development. The company targets digital agencies and small to medium businesses seeking tailored IT solutions. Technically, the website is built with modern HTML5, CSS3, and Tailwind CSS, and is mobile optimized with moderate performance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional web presence. Overall, the site scores well in content quality and business credibility but needs enhancements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching whyservices.net

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Whyservices OÜ operates in the technology sector focusing on IT consulting and hosting services. Their business model revolves around project-based consulting and managed hosting solutions, targeting niche markets such as digital agencies and SMEs. The company leverages partnerships with related domains like wellpress.com and wellhosted.tech to extend their service portfolio. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a moderate market position. Lack of public company registration details and WHOIS data limits deeper business intelligence. The minimal use of tracking and analytics suggests a privacy-conscious approach. Growth potential exists through expanding service offerings and improving trust signals such as certifications and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The lack of WHOIS registration data is a notable risk factor for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small IT service provider but requires enhancements in policy transparency, security headers, and domain registration verification to strengthen trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
  4. Publish terms of service and incident response contact details to increase transparency and preparedness.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Whyservices OÜ
Description
Homepage of the company Whyservices OÜ from Tallinn, Estonia. We are providing custom system administration, application hosting and IT infrastructure consulting.
Key services
Infrastructure Consulting, Wordpress Hosting (WellPress), Containerized Application Hosting (WellHost), Ruby on Rails Development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Tailwind CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered according to raw WHOIS output.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found on the site.
  4. Contact information limited to email only; no phone or physical address found.
  5. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Site uses minimal tracking via Plausible Analytics, indicating privacy-conscious analytics.
  8. No social media links or phone numbers found.
  9. External links to related service domains wellpress.com and wellhosted.tech.
  10. Site content is professional and relevant to IT consulting and hosting services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and Tailwind CSS for styling. It uses a deferred JavaScript script from a subdomain for analytics (Plausible Analytics), indicating a privacy-focused approach. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with no broken elements detected. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and privacy mechanisms suggests areas for modernization. The absence of structured data like JSON-LD limits SEO potential. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional user experience but can be improved with enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with whyservices.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review whyservices.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.