Skip to main content

Security report for whitedigital.eu

White Digital, SIA · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

White Digital, SIA is a Latvian IT company specializing in custom software development and IT infrastructure solutions for forward-looking businesses. Their services include full-cycle software development, business process analysis, security audits, and IoT solutions. The company demonstrates a solid market position with notable projects for clients such as Volkswagen & Audi and the Latvian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The website content is primarily in Latvian and targets regional businesses seeking tailored IT services. Technically, the website uses modern PHP frameworks like Yii 2.0 and Laravel, PostgreSQL databases, and Docker for virtualization. Google Tag Manager is implemented for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, HTTPS is enabled and CSRF tokens are present, but important security headers are missing. No explicit privacy or cookie policies were found, which is a compliance gap. The WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy policies, but the website provides clear company registration and contact details, supporting legitimacy. No signs of blocking or WAF interference were detected. Overall, the website presents a professional and credible business front with moderate technical and security maturity. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and accessibility would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching whitedigital.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

White Digital operates as a small-sized technology service provider in Latvia, focusing on software development and IT infrastructure. Their business model centers on delivering customized IT solutions to enterprises and government entities. The company leverages partnerships and client references to build credibility. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based software development, infrastructure management, and consulting services. The target market includes medium to large businesses requiring tailored IT systems. Growth indicators include diverse project portfolios and integration of modern technologies. The absence of social media presence suggests a focus on direct client relationships rather than broad digital marketing. The company maintains transparent banking and registration information, reinforcing business credibility.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and CSRF protection is implemented, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, indicating gaps in security governance and transparency. The use of modern frameworks suggests potential for secure coding practices, but without visible audits or certifications, the security maturity cannot be fully assessed. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and data protection officer information are not disclosed, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
White Digital, SIA
VAT number
LV50103381061
Registration number
50103381061
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
White Digital, SIA
Description
White Digital provides custom IT solutions including full-cycle software development, business process analysis, and tailored IT services for forward-looking companies.
Key services
Web applications and business tools, Infrastructure services, Security services, Electronics and Internet of Things (IoT)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP (Yii 2.0, Laravel), PostgreSQL, Docker, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Yii 2.0, Laravel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF token present in meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in the footer with company emails and phone numbers.
  4. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy policy.
  5. Website uses modern frameworks and technologies with moderate performance.
  6. Security headers are missing or not detected; CSRF token present in meta tags.
  7. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  8. No social media links detected on the site.
  9. Content is primarily in Latvian language targeting Latvian businesses.
  10. Company is registered in Latvia with full legal and banking details disclosed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern PHP frameworks Yii 2.0 and Laravel, supported by PostgreSQL databases and Docker for environment management. JavaScript is used for frontend interactivity, and Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses CSS and AOS animations for visual effects. Performance is moderate, with no critical loading issues detected. However, no CMS is identified, indicating a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are areas for technical improvement. SEO is adequately addressed with meta tags and structured navigation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with whitedigital.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review whitedigital.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.