Skip to main content

Security report for wgrdv.io

Rue des Vignerons · Other · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website wgrdv.io currently serves only a 404 error page in French, indicating that the requested content is unavailable or an unexpected error occurred. The domain is newly registered in May 2024 by an entity named Rue des Vignerons based in France. There is no substantive business description or services presented on the site. The technical infrastructure includes Google Tag Manager for analytics but lacks modern security headers and DNSSEC. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information is provided. Overall, the site appears to be in an early stage or under development, with minimal content and low trust indicators. From a technical perspective, the site is hosted via Gandi SAS with standard name servers but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improved security posture. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates some level of analytics tracking, but no cookie consent mechanism or privacy compliance is evident. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks accessibility and SEO optimizations. Security posture is weak due to missing security headers, lack of DNSSEC, and absence of privacy and cookie policies. No forms or inputs are present to assess for secure data handling. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate but very recent, which may explain the lack of content and policies. There is no evidence of WAF or blocking mechanisms, so the site is accessible but not functional for end users. Overall risk is moderate to high due to lack of content, policies, and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, implementing privacy and cookie policies, and developing substantive website content to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wgrdv.io

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wgrdv.io, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for wgrdv.io right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain wgrdv.io is registered to Rue des Vignerons, a French organization, suggesting a business entity possibly related to wine or vineyards given the name, but no website content confirms this. The lack of business description, contact details, or services indicates the site is either under construction or abandoned. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries. The business model and market positioning cannot be determined from the current data. The use of Google Tag Manager suggests intent to track user behavior, possibly for marketing or analytics purposes. The new domain age implies a startup or new project with limited online presence. No certifications or trust indicators are present, limiting credibility.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. The domain does not have DNSSEC enabled, which exposes it to DNS spoofing risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options are detected, increasing vulnerability to common web attacks. The site uses HTTPS (implied by URL) but no explicit SSL configuration details are provided. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is available. The absence of forms reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement. Overall, the site lacks fundamental security best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  4. Add clear contact information and security incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Enhance website content beyond error pages to provide meaningful business information and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rue des Vignerons
Description
No business description available; the website currently displays a 404 error page indicating the requested page is not found or an unexpected error occurred.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website currently serves a 404 error page with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms available.
  4. Uses Google Tag Manager for analytics/tracking.
  5. Domain registered recently with no DNSSEC enabled.
  6. No security headers detected.
  7. No visible business or security policies.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML with linked CSS stylesheets and Google Tag Manager for analytics. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. Hosting is provided by Gandi SAS with standard Gandi name servers. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are important for modern web security. Performance is moderate given minimal content. Mobile optimization is basic but present. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags beyond title and minimal content. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA or semantic enhancements detected. The site currently serves a 404 error page, indicating incomplete or missing content. There is no evidence of technical debt but the site requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wgrdv.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wgrdv.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.