Skip to main content

Security report for wetandpissy.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WetandPissy.com operates as a niche adult entertainment website focusing on fetish content related to urination and masturbation. The site offers exclusive videos and photos behind a membership paywall, targeting adult users interested in this specific fetish. The business model is subscription-based, with additional network partner sites linked for cross-promotion. Technically, the site employs a modern frontend stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Video.js for media playback, and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. However, there is a lack of visible privacy and cookie policies, and no contact or security policy information is provided, which raises compliance and trust concerns. The absence of WHOIS registration data further impacts the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the domain. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks security headers and formal policies. Overall, the site functions well for its niche audience but requires improvements in transparency, compliance, and security to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wetandpissy.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wetandpissy.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
756
Employees
0
Customers
756
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
24%

9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for wetandpissy.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself within a specialized adult content niche, leveraging exclusive fetish videos to attract a dedicated audience. Its partnership with related adult sites suggests a networked business approach to maximize reach and revenue. The subscription model indicates recurring revenue streams. However, the lack of publicly available company information, contact details, and compliance documentation limits its credibility and may hinder growth or partnerships. The site’s technical infrastructure is adequate for content delivery but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures to meet regulatory standards and user expectations.

Security posture

The current security posture shows basic implementation with HTTPS enabled and use of reputable third-party libraries. However, critical security headers are missing, and no explicit security or incident response policies are found. The absence of WHOIS data and privacy disclosures indicates potential compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR and data protection regulations. The site does not provide contact channels for security incidents or abuse reporting. These factors collectively lower the security maturity and increase risk exposure. Enhancing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts are recommended to improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden site security.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response and abuse reporting channels.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
WetandPissy.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in exclusive piss porn videos and photos featuring women engaging in urination and masturbation acts.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Exclusive fetish content, Membership access
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.4, Video.js, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Moment.js, Underscore.js, jQuery Cookie, jQuery LazyLoad
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
PennyNetwork
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content site specializing in niche fetish videos.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  4. Uses multiple third-party scripts and external domains for media and analytics.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, impacting trust and legitimacy assessment.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the provided data.
  7. Site uses HTTPS and modern frontend libraries but lacks visible compliance disclosures.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.4, Video.js, and various JavaScript libraries for UI and media playback, indicating a moderately modern frontend stack. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for styling and analytics respectively. The site appears mobile responsive and has a structured navigation system. However, there is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading but could be improved with optimization. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO is supported by meta tags and structured content. The lack of security headers and privacy compliance features are technical gaps that should be addressed to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wetandpissy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wetandpissy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.