Skip to main content

Security report for werkenbijggdghor.nl

GGD GHOR Nederland · Government · Netherlands

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GGD GHOR Nederland is a key governmental organization in the Netherlands focused on public health and safety. The website serves as a recruitment and informational portal highlighting their projects, values, and benefits for employees. The organization is positioned as a large, essential entity in the government and healthcare sectors, delivering impactful public health services and initiatives. Technically, the website uses modern web standards, including HTTPS, Bootstrap grid, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts, with a CMS likely based on Afas Profit. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and login mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and published security or privacy policies. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, only a contact form. WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy and consistency with the organization's claims. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but could improve privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching werkenbijggdghor.nl

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GGD GHOR Nederland operates in the public health government sector, offering services such as pandemic preparedness, childcare supervision, and health promotion programs. Their business model is focused on public service rather than commercial revenue. The website targets job seekers interested in contributing to public health in the Netherlands. The organization emphasizes innovation, collaboration, and inclusivity. They maintain a strong market position as a national health authority. The absence of direct contact details suggests a controlled communication channel typical for government entities. The partnership with RIVM and other health bodies is implied through project descriptions. Growth is indicated by ongoing projects and emphasis on employee development.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and login forms that mention captcha mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and readiness perception. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no visible consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by publishing policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide visible incident response and security contact information.
  4. Add cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization for better reach and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GGD GHOR Nederland
Description
GGD GHOR Nederland works on the health and safety of millions of people in the Netherlands. The organization focuses on public health impact, growth opportunities, and collaboration in a dynamic environment valuing expertise. They run projects related to child care supervision, pandemic preparedness, smoke-free generation initiatives, healthy start for children, and healthy living environments.
Key services
Public health protection and promotion, Pandemic preparedness, Childcare supervision, Smoke-free generation programs, Healthy start initiatives, Environmental health
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap Grid, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Montserrat), YouTube embed
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Login form present with captcha support mentioned in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional recruitment and informational portal for GGD GHOR Nederland.
  2. Content is primarily in Dutch language.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact is mainly via a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. No visible advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Security posture is good with HTTPS and login mechanisms but lacks published security policies.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency with the business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap grid system, Font Awesome icons, and Google Fonts (Montserrat). It embeds YouTube videos for multimedia content. The CMS appears to be Afas Profit, indicated by script paths and webform registrations. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies detected. The site lacks advanced frameworks or SPA technologies, indicating a traditional multi-page architecture. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags but no JSON-LD structured data found. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic markup.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with werkenbijggdghor.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review werkenbijggdghor.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.