Skip to main content

Security report for weluma.com

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

58/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ww1.weluma.com appears to be a non-registered or parked subdomain with minimal content. The site primarily consists of an embedded iframe from an unrelated external domain and includes tracking pixels. There is no visible business information, contact details, or privacy policies, indicating a lack of legitimate business presence or operational website. The domain WHOIS data confirms no registration, which further undermines trust and legitimacy. Technically, the site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, and the content quality is poor with minimal user engagement features. Security posture is weak due to the absence of best practices and the presence of third-party tracking without transparency. Overall, the site is likely a placeholder or proxy with WAF or security filtering mechanisms limiting content access.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weluma.com

This scan found 11 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
Average
58

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No identifiable business information, company name, or sector is present on the website or in WHOIS data. The lack of registration and content suggests no active business operations. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or market positioning can be inferred. The site does not provide any services or products, and no revenue streams or customer segments are identifiable. The domain appears to be unused or reserved without active business intent.

Security posture

The security posture is poor with no HTTPS enforcement visible in the HTML content and no security headers detected. The presence of tracking pixels and embedded iframes from external domains without privacy disclosures raises privacy concerns. The absence of incident response contacts, security policies, or vulnerability disclosures indicates low security maturity. The domain's unregistered status and minimal content further reduce trustworthiness. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not evident.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly with accurate WHOIS information to establish legitimacy.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Remove or audit third-party tracking pixels and embedded iframes to improve privacy and security.
  5. Develop meaningful website content with clear business information, contact details, and security policies to enhance trust and professionalism.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Content is minimal and consists mainly of an iframe embedding an external site with tracking pixels; WHOIS data shows no registration for the subdomain; likely a parked or proxy domain with WAF or security filtering. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, JavaScript
Performance
slow
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
l.cdn-fileserver.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data shows no registration for ww1.weluma.com subdomain
  2. Website content is minimal and primarily an embedded iframe from an unrelated domain
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact information or business details present
  5. Tracking pixels and external scripts present without transparency
  6. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in HTML content
  7. Likely a parked domain or proxy with WAF/security filtering
  8. Content safety is rated safe but content is minimal and non-informative
  9. Overall website quality and professionalism are poor
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and JavaScript with no detected CMS or frameworks. The content is minimal, consisting mainly of an iframe embedding an external site. There is no evidence of modern web technologies or performance optimization. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are lacking. SEO optimization is poor due to missing meta tags and structured data. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. The site appears slow and unprofessional, with technical debt and modernization opportunities evident.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weluma.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weluma.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.