Skip to main content

Security report for weekendinc.com

WEEKEND, Inc. · Technology · Indonesia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WEEKEND, Inc. is a digital product agency based in Jakarta, Indonesia, specializing in UI/UX design and development of websites and mobile applications for entrepreneurs, companies, and founders. The company positions itself as an innovative and human-centered technology partner, delivering scalable and beautiful digital products. Their market presence is supported by a professional website with clear branding and social media engagement. Technically, the website is built using modern technologies such as React and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, the security posture shows room for improvement, with no explicit security headers detected and no visible privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, which should be addressed to improve business credibility. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires enhancements in security and privacy transparency to meet higher standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weekendinc.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector as a small-sized digital product agency focused on delivering custom digital solutions across platforms. Their business model revolves around client projects in UI/UX design and software development, targeting startups, entrepreneurs, and established companies. The presence of a physical office in Jakarta and active social media channels indicates a legitimate operational footprint. The lack of WHOIS data and absence of privacy and security policies suggest potential gaps in corporate governance or domain management. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The company leverages modern web technologies and analytics tools to support marketing and user engagement. Growth potential is indicated by their emphasis on innovation and technology adoption, but trust and compliance improvements are needed to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS as indicated by the Open Graph URL but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing immediate risk of input-based vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, indicates limited transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The missing WHOIS registration data is a critical concern, as it undermines domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires implementation of best practices in headers, policies, and incident response to improve resilience and compliance with regulations like GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available or justified if privacy protected.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Add a security incident response page or contact channel to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PT Alfa Rekacipta Kreasi
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WEEKEND, Inc.
Description
WEEKEND, Inc — Making technology work for people. We are a digital product agency. We create products on every platform for companies of all sizes. We’d love to work with you, too.
Key services
Website development, Mobile app development, UI/UX design, Cloud partnership
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Tag Manager, Adobe Typekit Fonts, CSS Reset
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by og:url https://weekendinc.com)
  • No forms detected on homepage to collect sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional digital product agency based in Jakarta, Indonesia
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, domain may be unregistered or WHOIS blocked
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage
  4. Contact information includes physical address and phone number but no email contact found
  5. Social media presence on major platforms is linked
  6. Uses modern web technologies including React and Google Tag Manager
  7. No forms detected on homepage; no direct data collection observed
  8. No explicit security headers or policies detected in HTML content
  9. No security incident or vulnerability disclosure information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with integration of Google Tag Manager and Adobe Typekit fonts, indicating a contemporary front-end technology stack. The site uses CSS reset and custom stylesheets for consistent design. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. Mobile optimization is good with responsive images and layouts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated libraries. Opportunities exist to enhance security configurations and add structured data for richer search engine results.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weekendinc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weekendinc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.