Skip to main content

Security report for webvitalize.io

WebVitalize.io · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WebVitalize.io is a technology-focused SaaS platform specializing in real-time monitoring and predictive analytics of Core Web Vitals, essential metrics for website performance and SEO. The platform offers a comprehensive dashboard, competitor analysis, deployment monitoring, and proactive alerting services aimed at web developers, SEO professionals, and digital marketers. The website presents a professional and modern interface with clear messaging and partner endorsements, positioning itself as a niche player in the web performance analytics market. Technically, the site leverages modern JavaScript frameworks (likely Vue.js), integrates with Google Tag Manager, Datadog for logging, and uses Cloudfront CDN for hosting, indicating a mature and scalable infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA integration, though explicit security headers and published security policies are absent. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is typical for SaaS startups, but no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-implemented, and compliant with basic privacy standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webvitalize.io

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a specialized segment of the web performance monitoring market, focusing on Core Web Vitals, a critical SEO factor. Its business model is SaaS subscription-based, providing real-time insights and competitor benchmarking. The presence of partner logos from diverse domains suggests an expanding partnership ecosystem. The lack of direct contact information on the homepage may indicate a focus on self-service or enterprise sales channels. The platform's integration with advanced analytics and monitoring tools reflects a data-driven approach. Growth potential exists in expanding features and market reach, but transparency in security and incident response could be improved to enhance customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and monitoring via Datadog. However, the absence of explicit security headers, published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security governance and transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance with GDPR is implied through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. To elevate security posture, the company should implement and publish comprehensive security policies, incident response procedures, and consider a security.txt file for vulnerability reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Develop and make publicly available a formal security policy and incident response plan including dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing clear business contact information and support channels to improve trust and customer confidence.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included and maintain up-to-date software components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WebVitalize.io
Description
Monitor your Core Web Vitals in real-time using Real User Metrics, Crux & Lighthouse. Empowering your team with insights and data fast.
Key services
Real-time dashboard, Core Web Vitals scoring reports, Live competitor analysis, Deployment time monitoring, Proactive alert and monitoring service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, ApexCharts, Google Tag Manager, Datadog Browser Logs, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Cloudfront CDN
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration
  • Use of Datadog for error and log monitoring
  • Content Security Policy implied by script loading from trusted sources

Analytics and tracking

Services
Datadog Logs, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Datadog Logs
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a SaaS platform focused on real-time Core Web Vitals monitoring.
  2. Content is professional and well-structured with clear calls to action.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or footer.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and include consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed request and privacy protection.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  8. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  9. Partner logos indicate some market presence and trust signals.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, likely Vue.js, with a modular JavaScript architecture and use of ApexCharts for data visualization. Hosting via Amazon Cloudfront CDN ensures fast content delivery globally. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Datadog indicates a mature approach to analytics and error monitoring. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is fast with asynchronous script loading and minimal blocking resources. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve accessibility features and implement additional security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports scalability and reliability for a SaaS platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webvitalize.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webvitalize.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.