Skip to main content

Security report for webto.dk

Webto · Technology · Denmark

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Webto is a Danish technology company specializing in digital development, programming, and marketing services for both small and large businesses. With over 700 projects completed in 11 years, Webto positions itself as an experienced partner in website development and digital marketing. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with the Kadence theme and various plugins, reflecting a modern and responsive digital infrastructure. The technical stack includes SEO optimization tools and analytics services such as Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. Security-wise, the website uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, and does not publish a privacy policy or security incident response information, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is safe, business-focused, and trustworthy, with a solid domain registration history consistent with the company's claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webto.dk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
82
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Webto operates in the technology sector, targeting businesses requiring digital development and marketing services. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive project experience and professional digital presence. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on web development, programming, and marketing. The company leverages partnerships with analytics and marketing platforms to enhance service delivery. Growth indicators include a long domain registration and a consistent brand presence. However, the absence of explicit contact information and privacy policies may limit trust for some clients. Strategic partnerships and certifications are not evident from the data, suggesting potential areas for business development.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, and a cookie consent mechanism is in place, supporting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies or incident response contacts indicates gaps in security maturity. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency. The absence of direct contact information for security incidents may hinder incident response effectiveness. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the security posture would benefit from enhancements in DNS security, header implementation, and policy transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  5. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to increase transparency and security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Webto
Description
Webto er eksperter inden for udvikling, programmering og markedsføring, for store og små virksomheder med over 700 projekter de sidste 11 år.
Key services
website development, programming, marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Kadence theme, Kadence Blocks plugin, Kadence Conversions plugin, Kadence Pro, Rank Math SEO, Fluent Snippet Storage, Metronet Profile Picture plugin, WP Rocket (lazy load scripts), SimpleLightbox, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Leadinfo, CookieInformation consent script
Frameworks
Kadence Blocks
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Leadinfo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Leadinfo, Facebook Connect
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, Kadence Conversions
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via a third-party script.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Uses modern WordPress ecosystem with Kadence theme and plugins.
  6. No DNSSEC enabled for the domain.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. No security policy or incident response information published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Website content is safe and business-focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Kadence theme and several Kadence plugins, indicating a modern and flexible CMS infrastructure. Performance optimizations are evident through the use of WP Rocket for lazy loading scripts and minified CSS. SEO is enhanced via the Rank Math plugin, and analytics are integrated with Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Leadinfo. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests some technical debt in security configuration. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the domain registrar is CURANET A/S, a Danish registrar consistent with the website's geographic focus.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webto.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webto.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.