Skip to main content

Security report for websure.digital

Websure · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Websure is a specialized website security, maintenance, and management service targeting businesses, agencies, and individuals seeking expert-led, hassle-free website management solutions. The company emphasizes proactive threat detection, seamless updates, and scalable solutions to empower business growth. Their market position is strengthened by real human support, client testimonials, and partnerships with reputable hosting providers such as WP Engine. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern technologies including Tailwind CSS, Swiper.js, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. SEO and mobile optimization are well implemented, contributing to a professional digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and a dedicated security policy page are absent. Overall, the domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions or privacy protection, but the website content and business operations indicate legitimacy and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching websure.digital

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Websure operates a subscription-based business model providing website security and maintenance services. Their competitive advantage lies in combining automated monitoring with real human support and expert-led management. The company targets a broad range of customers from small businesses to agencies, offering flexible pricing plans and scalable solutions. Their partnership ecosystem includes WP Engine and CookieYes, enhancing service reliability and compliance. Growth indicators include active content marketing through reports and client stories. The company maintains a transparent approach, openly addressing supported hosting providers and CMS platforms. Strategic observations highlight the importance of trust signals such as testimonials and compliance with privacy regulations to attract and retain clients.

Security posture

Websure demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent compliance, and proactive threat management services. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduce transparency and may impact client confidence. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. GDPR compliance is supported by detailed cookie categories and consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness and data protection officer contact information are not publicly available, representing potential compliance gaps. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from enhanced documentation and communication of security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance browser security.
  2. Create and make accessible a dedicated security policy page outlining security measures, incident response procedures, and contact channels.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with best practices and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Websure
Description
Website management you can rely on. Experts in secure, seamless website management — so you can focus on growth.
Key services
Website security monitoring, Malware scanning and removal, Firewall protection, Security updates, Proactive threat prevention, Website backups, Performance optimization, SEO best practices, Website redesign and updates
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Swiper.js, Magnific Popup, Tailwind CSS, CookieYes cookie consent, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • Proactive security service described

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear business focus on website security and management.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user controls.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses found; only email contact provided.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to TLD restrictions or privacy protection.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices evident.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found on site.
  8. Strong client testimonials and partner logos enhance trust.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform utilizing modern front-end technologies such as Tailwind CSS for styling, Swiper.js for sliders, and Magnific Popup for modals. SEO is managed via the Yoast SEO plugin, and analytics are implemented through Google Tag Manager. Cookie consent is managed by CookieYes, providing granular user controls. Hosting is likely provided by WP Engine, as referenced in the content. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security header implementation. The infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence aligned with the company's business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with websure.digital. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review websure.digital.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.