Skip to main content

Security report for websecured.io

WebSecured AS · Technology · Norway

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WebSecured AS is a Norwegian cybersecurity service provider specializing in penetration testing, security audits, code review, and physical security testing. The company serves a diverse clientele including major organizations such as Microsoft, Vipps, and the Norwegian Tax Administration, positioning itself as a trusted small business in the cybersecurity sector. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence built on Vue.js and Nuxt.js frameworks, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The use of Cloudflare for DNS and CDN enhances their hosting reliability and security. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection, though improvements are recommended in security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. Contact information is clearly provided, including email, phone, and physical address. Overall, WebSecured demonstrates a credible and trustworthy business with a good balance of technical maturity and client trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching websecured.io

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention websecured.io, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for websecured.io right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WebSecured operates in the technology sector focusing on cybersecurity services. Their business model revolves around providing specialized security services to both large enterprises and smaller clients. The company leverages its reputation from recognized clients and public acknowledgements, such as Microsoft's vulnerability recognition, to build market credibility. Their target audience includes brands, private persons, and small businesses seeking security expertise. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence, supported by client testimonials and social media engagement. Growth potential is indicated by their ongoing service expansion and public security disclosures. Partnerships with notable clients enhance their competitive advantage. The company is relatively young, founded in 2019, and maintains privacy protection on domain registration, which is justified given the nature of their business.

Security posture

WebSecured exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, domain transfer protection, and privacy-protected WHOIS registration. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. The website does not publish a formal security policy or incident response contact, which could enhance transparency and trust. The presence of client testimonials and a public vulnerability disclosure acknowledgement from Microsoft indicates responsible security practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by adopting additional security best practices and formalizing incident response communications.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosures.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and cookie usage more explicitly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
WebSecured AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WebSecured AS
Description
WebSecured is a pentesting service helping brands and private persons with security. They also offer development services.
Key services
Security audits, Penetration testing, Code review, Physical security testing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Vuetify, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vuetify
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Privacy protection on WHOIS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear focus on penetration testing and security services.
  3. Strong client testimonials and references to reputable clients.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response info published.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies present with consent mechanism.
  6. WHOIS privacy protection used but justified.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks Vue.js and Nuxt.js, with Vuetify for UI components, indicating a contemporary and maintainable tech stack. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, enhancing performance and security. Google Analytics is used for traffic analysis, reflecting moderate user tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with preloading of scripts and stylesheets. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based site. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with room for improvement in security headers and privacy transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with websecured.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review websecured.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.