Skip to main content

Security report for webnode.cz

Webnode AG · Technology · Switzerland

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Webnode AG operates a multilingual SaaS platform enabling users to create websites easily, including AI-assisted website generation. The company targets small businesses, individuals, and hobbyists with a freemium model and premium services such as domain registration, e-commerce, and email hosting. The platform is well-established with over 50 million websites created. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including AngularJS, Google Analytics, Google Ads, and Cloudfront CDN, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but the overall brand presence and content quality indicate legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing security policies, improving WHOIS transparency, and enhancing vulnerability disclosure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webnode.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention webnode.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
31,836
Employees
0
Customers
31,758
Third parties
78
Weak passwords
21%

521 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for webnode.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Webnode AG holds a strong market position in the website builder industry, offering AI-driven and template-based website creation tools. Its business model relies on freemium access with upselling premium features such as domain names, e-commerce capabilities, and email services. The company supports a broad international audience with multiple language versions and localized content. Partnerships and compliance initiatives such as a whistleblowing portal indicate corporate governance maturity. The platform's ease of use and AI integration provide competitive advantages. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees, domain sales, and premium service charges. Growth is supported by extensive marketing and affiliate programs.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 and v3 to mitigate automated abuse, and cookie consent with user choice management. Accessibility is enhanced via AccessiWay integration. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Security headers are partially implemented but could be improved with additional headers like X-Content-Type-Options. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from greater transparency and formalized policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers by adding X-Content-Type-Options and Referrer-Policy headers.
  4. Improve WHOIS transparency by ensuring domain registration data is publicly available or clearly justified if privacy protected.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Webnode AG
Description
Webnode provides an easy-to-use website builder platform allowing users to create websites quickly and without programming. It offers AI-assisted website creation, templates, premium services, domain registration, e-commerce solutions, and customer support.
Key services
AI website builder, Website templates, Domain registration, E-commerce platform, Email hosting, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Ads, reCAPTCHA v2 and v3, Cloudfront CDN, AngularJS (ng-2018 class), AccessiWay accessibility tool
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 and v3 for bot protection
  • Cookie consent banner with management options
  • Content Security Policy nonce usage in scripts
  • Accessibility compliance via AccessiWay

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Marketing tools
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact via forms
  5. Multiple language support and international presence
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
  7. No WHOIS data available for domain, raising minor trust concerns
  8. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a proprietary CMS platform with AngularJS frontend framework and leverages Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. It integrates multiple Google services for analytics, tag management, and advertising, alongside reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features via AccessiWay. Performance is fast with efficient use of caching and CDN. The technical stack is modern but includes legacy AngularJS which may require future modernization. The site uses nonce-based Content Security Policy for script security. Overall, the infrastructure supports a scalable, secure, and user-friendly experience with room for technical updates.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webnode.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webnode.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.