Skip to main content

Security report for webmarked.net

Webmarked · E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Webmarked is a small e-commerce application development company specializing in Shopify apps such as Smart Wishlist and Smart RSS Feed. Their offerings target Shopify store owners aiming to increase sales and improve customer engagement. The website is built on WordPress using the OnePress theme and integrates common plugins like Contact Form 7 and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The technical infrastructure is standard and moderately optimized for performance and mobile use. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and spam protection mechanisms in place, though the absence of security headers and explicit privacy policies indicates room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially impacting trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents a professional business presence with moderate risk due to incomplete transparency in domain registration and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webmarked.net

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention webmarked.net, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for webmarked.net right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Webmarked operates in the niche e-commerce sector, focusing on Shopify app development. Their business model is SaaS-based, providing apps that enhance Shopify store functionality. The company appears to have a stable customer base with over 1500 stores and millions of end users served. Their market position is that of a specialized provider with competitive advantages in wishlist and RSS feed solutions. Revenue streams likely come from app sales and subscriptions via the Shopify App Store. The target customers are Shopify merchants seeking to improve user experience and sales. The partnership with Shopify and PluginHive indicates a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include positive feedback and a sizable user base. However, the lack of detailed company information and direct contact details limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam and abuse. Akismet plugin is used for additional spam filtering. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense in depth. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which may hinder effective communication during security events. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. GDPR compliance is not clearly addressed, and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small e-commerce app provider but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Webmarked
Description
Pioneers in E-commerce Application Development offering apps designed to help Shopify store owners increase sales. Trusted by hundreds of ecommerce stores worldwide.
Key services
Smart Wishlist app, Smart RSS Feed app
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Font Awesome, Bootstrap, Akismet, Jetpack
Frameworks
OnePress WordPress Theme
Platforms
Shopify (apps offered for Shopify stores)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on contact form
  • Akismet spam protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats, Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact available only via a web form; no direct emails or phone numbers provided.
  5. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL and modern security practices like reCAPTCHA.
  6. Business focuses on Shopify ecommerce apps with a niche market.
  7. Technical stack is standard WordPress with common plugins and theme.
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the OnePress theme, leveraging standard web technologies such as PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome. It integrates plugins like Contact Form 7 for form handling, Akismet for spam protection, and Jetpack for analytics. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented for bot mitigation on contact forms. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO practices are evident with proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, there is an opportunity to improve technical robustness by adding security headers and enhancing accessibility compliance. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, and no CDN or advanced performance optimization techniques are detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webmarked.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webmarked.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.