Skip to main content

Security report for webmark.eu

MANOVA GmbH · Other · Austria

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WEBMARK is a business intelligence platform developed by MANOVA GmbH, an Austrian company specializing in integrating data from business administration, market research, and marketing to provide actionable insights through live online reports. The company positions itself as a niche provider with a strong focus on tourism and related sectors, leveraging exclusive partnerships such as with dwif consulting. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and offers clear navigation with multilingual support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a mix of modern and legacy technologies, including Bootstrap and jQuery. Analytics are implemented via Piwik/Matomo, indicating a moderate level of user tracking. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, but lacks some security headers and explicit privacy/cookie policies. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for European businesses, and the domain appears legitimate based on website content and contact information. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained but could improve privacy compliance and security headers.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of webmark.eu. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webmark.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the business intelligence sector with a focus on tourism and leisure industries. Its competitive advantage lies in combining software solutions with strategic and analytical consulting, differentiating from pure software vendors. Revenue likely comes from licensing the WEBMARK platform and consulting services. The target customers are organizations requiring benchmarking, monitoring, information systems, and quality management solutions. The partnership ecosystem includes exclusive collaborations with consulting firms like dwif. The business appears small but specialized, with a consistent brand and professional online presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure POST methods for login forms, which is positive. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy and cookie policies are not clearly presented, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adding missing headers and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  3. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Update legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.11.1 to more secure, modern versions.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and data protection officer contact details to align with best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MANOVA GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MANOVA GmbH
Description
WEBMARK is a Business Intelligence solution by MANOVA that integrates data from business administration, market research, and marketing to provide live online reports and analyses. It is not a classic software product but a flexible, adaptable solution combined with conceptual and analytical expertise.
Key services
Benchmarking, Monitoring, Information Systems, Quality Management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.1, Bootstrap 3.0.3, Font Awesome 4.0.3, WordPress 6.2.2, Piwik/Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login form with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik/Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik/Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German with English alternative available.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with company emails and phone numbers.
  5. Site uses WordPress CMS with older jQuery version but modern Bootstrap and Font Awesome.
  6. Analytics via Piwik/Matomo is implemented.
  7. No social media links detected in the provided HTML.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. Login form uses POST method and is hosted on a subdomain (webmark.manova.at).
  10. WHOIS data is not publicly disclosed, typical for EU domains with privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.2.2 with Bootstrap 3.0.3 and Font Awesome 4.0.3, indicating a mix of modern and somewhat dated technologies. jQuery version 1.11.1 is outdated and may pose security risks. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking issues. Mobile optimization is good with responsive CSS. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (schema.org WebSite and WebPage types). Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Analytics are implemented via Piwik/Matomo, indicating a preference for privacy-respecting analytics over Google Analytics.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webmark.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webmark.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.